Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org
	designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=80.91.229.3;
	envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org;
	helo=plane.gmane.org; 
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
From: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:24:58 +0100
Message-ID: <lb1p3d$3ef$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAPg+sBhdgVQvumL_r9thLD5wm7UOJx=2DE+01-T58HHdimvpXw@mail.gmail.com>	<lb18l6$nu2$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<CAPg+sBji5sFWZ_mDVXKKwkyeGYDbLmvwau457nmntT_NgTT+Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBji5sFWZ_mDVXKKwkyeGYDbLmvwau457nmntT_NgTT+Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment protocol and reliable Payment
	messages
Precedence: list

Thanks for the explanation.

On 01/13/2014 06:56 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:

>> As for you proposal, just be aware I'd like to use the payment protocol
>> for face to face payments as well. That meant payment request via NFC or
>> QR, payment message and payment confirmations via Bluetooth. I think it
>> can be done by putting a Bluetooth mac address into the payment_url.
> 
> I'm aware. What issues do you see?

Looks good so far. Just wanted to keep you aware (-: