Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5fYP-00044O-GT for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:32:49 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.174; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f174.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z5fYO-0007xd-Ot for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:32:49 +0000 Received: by igbqq3 with SMTP id qq3so23548751igb.0 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.163.146 with SMTP id m140mr17381643ioe.85.1434655963557; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.147.213 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9BD8D5D8-3A4B-4361-BF4C-25E1019CA428@bluematt.me> References: <55828737.6000007@riseup.net> <20150618111407.GA6690@amethyst.visucore.com> <0ede5c200ce70e4d92541dd91749b4ea@riseup.net> <9BD8D5D8-3A4B-4361-BF4C-25E1019CA428@bluematt.me> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:32:43 +0000 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Matt Corallo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1Z5fYO-0007xd-Ot Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:32:49 -0000 On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Matt Corallo wr= ote: > Ive been trying to stay out of these increasingly useless shit-throwing c= ontests, but I wanted to take objection to this... I highly, highly doubt a= ny seriously technical person is making any kind of decision on block size = issues based on their own personal network. If you're assuming this is a se= rious motivating factor for anyone, then I'm not sure you've even been read= ing your email or listening to the conversations you've had with people ove= r the last year or more. It's probably due to me: When I point to trends and broadband _distribution_ in the US (much less the less developed parts of the world), I'm being "hypothetical", and when I point to my _own_ connectivity as a concrete example it's "personal". It's no joke that communication is _hard_ but it's a shared responsibility however, and no need to assume anyone isn't reading.,