Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of
	pixodegames.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.215.54;
	envelope-from=flavien.charlon@pixodegames.com;
	helo=mail-la0-f54.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJHLa0NPJgZqgxhGYrFXdHwAgYNnE_At7tDzLb2V=K5TnXO7FQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABbpET-uDQRFQ_XAFeWkgc=A1jEW62Q+8BTZZuW5UbZXX0y+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJHLa0NPJgZqgxhGYrFXdHwAgYNnE_At7tDzLb2V=K5TnXO7FQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Flavien Charlon <flavien.charlon@coinprism.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 11:05:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CABbpET9W28zKKWjXTDm6k6ka48+giy7JQBAbDBtJNsS3WqRv-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133a77461bd3804f8902a58
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug with handing of OP_RETURN?
Precedence: list

--001a1133a77461bd3804f8902a58
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thanks, that makes sense, just wanted to make sure this what the problem
was.


On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Flavien Charlon
> <flavien.charlon@coinprism.com> wrote:
> > Outputs are above dust, inputs are not spent. OP_RETURN is supposed to be
> > standard in 0.9.1 and the data is well below 40 bytes, so why is this
> being
> > rejected?
>
> The carried data must all be contained within one pushdata.
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/
>

--001a1133a77461bd3804f8902a58
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Thanks, that makes sense, just wanted to make sure this wh=
at the problem was.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"g=
mail_quote">On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Garzik <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@bitpay.com" target=3D"_blank">jgarzik@bitpay.c=
om</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Flavien=
 Charlon<br>
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:flavien.charlon@coinprism.com">flavien.charlon@coinpr=
ism.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; Outputs are above dust, inputs are not spent. OP_RETURN is supposed to=
 be<br>
&gt; standard in 0.9.1 and the data is well below 40 bytes, so why is this =
being<br>
&gt; rejected?<br>
<br>
</div>The carried data must all be contained within one pushdata.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
Jeff Garzik<br>
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist<br>
BitPay, Inc. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://bitpay.com/" target=3D"=
_blank">https://bitpay.com/</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a1133a77461bd3804f8902a58--