Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C3213E9 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:17:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com (mail-ed1-f66.google.com [209.85.208.66]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA72A8 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id r15so5256968eds.9 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:17:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fPNhTz9w+gIerHLDgTOO92jd0bEQAoxIjT0+iLeuWZk=; b=kBt1N9vJYJq2YHF5VIvOJ5PCaCAfsh57nTIcgUjrUopN94sdZKdyIDod2m2hT7iX/M 1GT6PromOS3juuS9sbOj+YhCNzb0YcMbP1RcJAQNFYS7GIXCS3AzfMhOUpQIL79Zc/9e aUBzmzF5GVh2JOxfo8znPSUQEKmHbdcI3AHU8Rd3k8tcZwQoyp/UQ+qJmXbJe+lNyY6h uWnwDeZbNsye1uZckpbEiYdY7ga1vfSMzg0r0bzRSWcKwvr9hWLuAY/4W26N5m5UdQjV OsfgB3KGJmgsohjTLqpUBctSYg5y2pt8Jw/52NmapOu8JiOWyG9HGj4pnrlrZhwexhHp w0oA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuazkpW7WiPmGOmZ9N15ELaWSzJtVYPR9nZCE+0HM2XNXQcK/OHt Xy6Ck/ZQddYN+l6OQ8IrpWfE5xBV1GxOZKmeQpM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZaCGWl9u/ePm5szu6My2YP89jpKvTlXG0n+NhI1btVIzlI7/entKQhxPOlJeVRVaFBp9PBNhJRIoDI8QjMO+U= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:35d9:: with SMTP id p25mr8361357ejb.98.1549477044778; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:17:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6D57649F-0236-4FBA-8376-4815F5F39E8A@gmail.com> <6D36035C-A675-4845-9292-3BC16CD19B41@gmail.com> <5A850549-B6C9-4590-BA9B-0D69BBE531F9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5A850549-B6C9-4590-BA9B-0D69BBE531F9@gmail.com> From: Gregory Maxwell Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:17:11 +0000 Message-ID: To: Tamas Blummer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 20:16:52 +0000 Cc: Jim Posen , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Interrogating a BIP157 server, BIP158 change proposal X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:17:27 -0000 On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:10 AM Tamas Blummer wrote: > I am skeptical that commitment of any filter will come into Core soon. [...] A committed filter makes light clients much more reliable and attractive, for some taste too much more. You keep repeating this smear. Please stop. If you would actually bother reading the threads where this was discussed previously you will see that there was significant interest from bitcoin developers to eventually commit an output filter, and a significant investment of effort in improving the proposal to that end. It is really disheartening to see you continue to repeat your negative assumptions about other people's wishes when you haven't even invested the time required to read their words.