Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5A1983D for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:29:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CFD0E3 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.10.25] (B [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:29:48 -0400 References: <558B4632.8080504@bitcoins.info> <558C03F1.70603@sky-ip.org> <53DED62D-6645-464A-998F-C31464FD0C1A@gmail.com> Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org From: Milly Bitcoin Message-ID: <558C3A87.4040907@bitcoins.info> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:29:43 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050603050008020106000306" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_HEADERS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process and Votes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:29:52 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050603050008020106000306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In the context of this discussion the Bitcoin Core release manager is the "decider" of what goes into the release. Nobody said he was elected. The discussion also has nothing to do with any specific person and nobody said anyone did anything wrong. One of the reason why a process needs to be developed so issues are not sidetracked into a dramatized discussion over personalities which is a big waste of time. Some of the developers are now essentially full time drama queens who write a little bit of code on the side. Russ On 6/25/2015 1:03 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Eric Lombrozo > wrote: > > Wladimir is doing an amazing job under difficult circumstances. > Give the guy a break, please > > > A+ agreed. He is not an elected decider - he is the Bitcoin Core > release manager, and has been doing a damn fine job. > > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev --------------050603050008020106000306 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In the context of this discussion the Bitcoin Core release manager is the "decider" of what goes into the release.  Nobody said he was elected.  The discussion also has nothing to do with any specific person and nobody said anyone did anything wrong.  One of the reason why a process needs to be developed so issues are not sidetracked into a dramatized discussion over personalities which is a big waste of time.  Some of the developers are now essentially full time drama queens who write a little bit of code on the side.

Russ




On 6/25/2015 1:03 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> wrote:
Wladimir is doing an amazing job under difficult circumstances. Give the guy a break, please

A+ agreed.  He is not an elected decider - he is the Bitcoin Core release manager, and has been doing a damn fine job.



_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

--------------050603050008020106000306--