Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 812884A0 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:19:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD02914F for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so282315wib.0 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:19:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=nVy2TP0YuNZsHI9js/e04TSp/K7rm1S97PQ8LtR4Gbg=; b=pZikbCDU9T7xO3PnOJZtk4bKg9o6EMEdZ82c3fQ1GSRN5qAtO+MvuOH9dcHnDxlI9K NjQ6Z+qh7DGrwS24eHwQmVie9G5bIVWizrjVGj1hcx0K7+Zk20q4BRhUMvyGUH91/REe Ir/wp1j01BIOk67KvU5AH7up8cAGJghQClO7+HC6C0qY4ym81gvu3rRKtpuyiNcLz/R4 rbZYCHUtvYhzLGhjgKKr85tKHxRUwkJSq2IdbNTq290dg+4H38u/+PB/Xr3IH7SxTD6Y MZS3wNatJBhEZd1Fmduev+pksJiPqk2Up9Azae+Vuqe+SkLBxZJjFJSPPktag+4VaMFX XfCA== X-Received: by 10.180.106.5 with SMTP id gq5mr19201499wib.61.1437682358556; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:12:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.37.133 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:12:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeremy Rubin Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 04:12:19 +0800 Message-ID: To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044306b2481cf0051b9082aa X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Draft: Minimum Viable TXIn Hash X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:19:42 -0000 --f46d044306b2481cf0051b9082aa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Please see the following draft BIP which should decrease the amount of bytes needed per transaction. This is very much a draft BIP, as the design space for this type of improvement is large. This BIP can be rolled out by a soft fork. Improvements are around 12% for standard "one in two out" txn, and even more with more inputs hashes. https://gist.github.com/JeremyRubin/e175662d2b8bf814a688 --f46d044306b2481cf0051b9082aa Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Please see the= following draft BIP which should decrease the amount of bytes needed per t= ransaction. This is very much a draft BIP, as the design space for this typ= e of improvement is large.=C2=A0

This BIP can b= e rolled out by a soft fork.=C2=A0

Improvements= are around 12% for =C2=A0standard "one in two out" txn, and even= more with more inputs hashes.

https://g= ist.github.com/JeremyRubin/e175662d2b8bf814a688

--f46d044306b2481cf0051b9082aa--