MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dscotese@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <3B18134A-3E3A-4A98-ADD3-9F5E8600047E@gmail.com>
References: <87si1rycux.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <2998879.R5sQRbxZRv@1337h4x0r>
	<87powvy20w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1736759.DT0dcscznj@1337h4x0r>
	<20160123205953.GA22494@muck>
	<3B18134A-3E3A-4A98-ADD3-9F5E8600047E@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:06:23 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGLBAhfBwxnYyN=8EmpaZrfZSDWTL1StZOpqUO3scdzTu+Qxdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Scotese <dscotese@litmocracy.com>
To: Gavin <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three Month bitcoin-dev Moderation Review
Precedence: list

--001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1
The distinction we are making importantly requires that contributors
provide readers with another thing to say in favor of something - another
thing which is different than "X people support this instead of only X-1
people."  Evidence trumps votes.

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>
> > On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should
> > contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation
> > the last +1 gave isn't useful.
>
> Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either technical
> discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the following
> should be encouraged:
>
> "+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that
> would have been prevented if XYZ.
>
> Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com"
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>



-- 
I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a
techie?
I own Litmocracy <http://www.litmocracy.com> and Meme Racing
<http://www.memeracing.net> (in alpha).
I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist <http://www.voluntaryist.com> which
now accepts Bitcoin.
I also code for The Dollar Vigilante <http://dollarvigilante.com/>.
"He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satoshi
Nakamoto

--001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>+1<br></div>The distinction we are making importantly=
 requires that contributors provide readers with another thing to say in fa=
vor of something - another thing which is different than &quot;X people sup=
port this instead of only X-1 people.&quot;=C2=A0 Evidence trumps votes.<br=
></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Ja=
n 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin=
-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><br>
&gt; On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D=
"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfound=
ation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should<=
br>
&gt; contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation<br>
&gt; the last +1 gave isn&#39;t useful.<br>
<br>
</span>Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either techn=
ical discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the followin=
g should be encouraged:<br>
<br>
&quot;+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that=
 would have been prevented if XYZ.<br>
<br>
Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com&quot;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_sig=
nature"><div dir=3D"ltr">I like to provide some work at no charge to prove =
my value. Do you need a techie?=C2=A0 <br>I own <a href=3D"http://www.litmo=
cracy.com" target=3D"_blank">Litmocracy</a> and <a href=3D"http://www.memer=
acing.net" target=3D"_blank">Meme Racing</a> (in alpha). <br>I&#39;m the we=
bmaster for <a href=3D"http://www.voluntaryist.com" target=3D"_blank">The V=
oluntaryist</a> which now accepts Bitcoin.<br>I also code for <a href=3D"ht=
tp://dollarvigilante.com/" target=3D"_blank">The Dollar Vigilante</a>.<br>&=
quot;He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules&quot; - Satos=
hi Nakamoto</div></div>
</div>

--001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1--