Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78ABA919 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:55:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3811C9 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m101so48710080ioi.2 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:55:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XgD44/NWeBJCvcphNDHHb34NI2Vo+5uyyGp4VSfr3kM=; b=WbohqcxhsJf2OCSNA2MbmBPaMFiOaGIJIyHwbrNnF1hMjTGjB8bgkMYmnsSaXEsA+o bMP9snvv1VCloVtikq9knRTdEkn+8HbcSvv8P07c8aglPZQgdAEK3AAOEUQf0d4G4kuT k97AjEZ3WA35uLdZdEjX35vX+d/0OV9EPHtcsNs+8fFPXbpDW0mTtiCqBUG5USHmrk9k RLLYFInCU88p/VXpb/I7pMulK4ndskdmFKH+rp8wCH49QqkOklBdwC4rY6+F5eS2CVhU MQcujflUriiSFuGIHMbqXY6dNcqkkaJhL6zY+njtskFTzufxqtWWUeAP8UHYdQw3K+JA lB5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=XgD44/NWeBJCvcphNDHHb34NI2Vo+5uyyGp4VSfr3kM=; b=hU59ucv4KUmV3qm22YD4cDd2st3u5e0oEkd9ZU5nQvN66IA4B4CgGbqWl5Rc0ox08Q o7frHhaLrHBPe8NOC4/oNqxy/l1P+YvqAnYShz3V/17jX5JdeY20LPzmFEl4gn/29fJT R5JrrpKhszUeByJ6vVmipouUdwHvJYCD0pz4+tDeUs9x9pgmZ1NYsesaHJe3NgWVAqSv wChYbGoh9i/ttFAQGpTdemH/p1FWlNa7wyzpVl9fTnPujGnJTFtYq0SgKcEapZOrucU8 s1Zb42ZVystDFC8Vs8JQBdKu2pd6LTEe0cBfapY8Blo4IwK3iLOEANO/HgOUrCj347gw 8qIA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoout2xeE/D2mPeCVQ2TbzCT5qKttiZBQQfKfc3Fzjrk0OUxb84PpKOxIrddGS/PHfX0TPi5LR0aFudj67iA== X-Received: by 10.107.46.149 with SMTP id u21mr6700060iou.125.1470851705348; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:55:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.128.97 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.128.97 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:55:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Daniel Hoffman Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:55:04 -0500 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion , Pieter Wuille Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ad90c6a25ce0539bb5943 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Addresses over Audio X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:55:07 -0000 --001a113ad90c6a25ce0539bb5943 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 thats how i thought it worked originally, but im not well versed on that, so i took his word for it On Aug 10, 2016 12:38 PM, "Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > By sending a public seed, there's no way for someone to use the > transmitted > > address and trace the total amount of payments to it. > > Worse. By revealing a public seed, anyone who has seen it (= anyone > who ever pays you through it) can identity all payments to _any_ > address derived from that seed. > > -- > Pieter > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --001a113ad90c6a25ce0539bb5943 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

thats how i thought it worked originally, but im not well ve= rsed on that, so i took his word for it


On Aug 10, 2016 1= 2:38 PM, "Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org<= /a>> wrote:
On We= d, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
<
bitcoin-dev@li= sts.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> By sending a public seed,=C2=A0 there's no way for someone to use = the transmitted
> address and trace the total amount of payments to it.

Worse. By revealing a public seed, anyone who has seen it (=3D anyone
who ever pays you through it) can identity all payments to _any_
address derived from that seed.

--
Pieter
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org= /mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--001a113ad90c6a25ce0539bb5943--