Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF2DCBD for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 23:28:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB9787A7 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 23:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id d189-v6so12688987oib.6 for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 16:28:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QTJNe/8rMPfMzBNI+aBymEUI5bpDtTUCVhye8f9jRAc=; b=Ovwj/xIQL+F1UyN99kh4VF0RspAP/lLSoGLVXzQPyxYAhTkyAaZfsEpTeoNEPeC3Am ZBKRyWDpIVTqvzkUU9xQ4pUF9ZeJCGwBDVNGS7Uzuf1cIHHrfD2X1ja5gsHS/OTr5iCg 5gaAFAkVdb+W8Xv0byk81W2/0yGGFIx2JRBBEY/PIVoiW/6MlZ9Yj7+8DqQ6H9NbbdC5 z0jxpA6e9byPEoZxXnQTTlMH3WU1GHrh176Eb6EdKfWnewmGbblcpOdxlDFMjhMA/NEE a6eVHK7q3SUScEmHDlRjXGuYusS+ccqMdKPtghzL/jeMoixVj6px5Lbss4WnV0CYCjkm Mbrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=QTJNe/8rMPfMzBNI+aBymEUI5bpDtTUCVhye8f9jRAc=; b=eJzGIRzF4JqfrCPeslpN8lAqHupqySso9jb3s5SAC7X7SEERlZip+YEqVyijlt1r4k 3+/yfSddPRwTmYZAPEoJ61gIuZ7m28OfKWsfaNbxrSeeyWgG+pezPW2i1Q2NfarLtJVo HZL8HshgDKsOVeSfrgpjnDYqqHMAO49mIHAqI4ScwiTMiMNGJtZvNm1Cb9XksK8ECbNo DH4XYMeZz6mmaurz2hcsR3OY96KzENbP8i7B0mfvJbxMqb0aGOzAWCXzBY9MLcKVq+31 XwMdOU+egFGut5nDJGr88Oq1KaZkD3TIu4c7c7I19uuEfxBEBFBRAMgg6plMxd2jI+P1 2FoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlG0L6c7yUBvLUVtWInOLrCtKoXqO0kL8XakNsBhvVSjFJPUe8QR sT7IXFIELCIO54L9Xr369GrrL3Ju6XpnSfNokUI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfaLBWuHEkLNoOe/rGoTyErpZb4yPpSvNJWunvIZak6/EcQgsRULUJTrC4ScGMGTXCVyhmnwJyJ6/tz00F/3bw= X-Received: by 2002:aca:a64d:: with SMTP id p74-v6mr4987182oie.149.1533338893893; Fri, 03 Aug 2018 16:28:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: M Bz Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 19:28:02 -0400 Message-ID: To: bram@chia.net, bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000017466305729048e0" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 00:41:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BLS library released X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 23:28:15 -0000 --00000000000017466305729048e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" nice! how does it compare to Shigeo's implementation? https://github.com/herumi/bls On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 7:10 PM Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > BLS signatures have the same aggregation feature as Schnorr signatures but > even better because the aggregation can be done non-interactively, at the > expense of being a bit slower. We just released a first draft (but fully > functional) library for doing BLS signatures based on a construction based > on musig. Feedback, discussion, and usage is very welcome. > > https://github.com/Chia-Network/bls-signatures > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --00000000000017466305729048e0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
nice! how does it compare to Shigeo's implementation?= =C2=A0https://github.com/herumi/b= ls

On Fri, Aug 3, = 2018 at 7:10 PM Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> = wrote:
BLS signatu= res have the same aggregation feature as Schnorr signatures but even better= because the aggregation can be done non-interactively, at the expense of b= eing a bit slower. We just released a first draft (but fully functional) li= brary for doing BLS signatures based on a construction based on musig. Feed= back, discussion, and usage is very welcome.

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--00000000000017466305729048e0--