Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of qq.com
	designates 14.17.43.214 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=14.17.43.214; envelope-from=165318903@qq.com;
	helo=smtpbg329.qq.com; 
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Potter QQ <165318903@qq.com>
In-Reply-To: <a9e2e033c786fb7f99bcf7505ad45f21@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:30:05 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <93C95467-E3A6-4247-9284-699A99B34904@qq.com>
References: <CALqxMTHrnSS9MGgKO-5+=fVhiOOvk12Recs11S0PcSUxQT1wdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+c4Zoy6U9RXH3Qw15sXXnaeYL-9PFbnTp=VLAJsvpC_zoAK_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEY8wq41ftFA1ObyUWiRGOgebwqDCAw_j+hU6_wfcXv5GSZaJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201506160341.10994.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAEY8wq4SOddGUJNqkrdhhfQEn4tXehCWiifk-P=PYUdfFcXFTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<a9e2e033c786fb7f99bcf7505ad45f21@riseup.net>
To: "justusranvier@riseup.net" <justusranvier@riseup.net>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market
Precedence: list

No,Bitcoin=20


=E5=8F=91=E8=87=AA=E6=88=91=E7=9A=84 iPhone

> =E5=9C=A8 2015=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=8816=E6=97=A5=EF=BC=8C13:28=EF=BC=8Cjustusr=
anvier@riseup.net =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
>=20
>> On 2015-06-16 03:49, Kevin Greene wrote:
>> =E2=80=8BHah, fair enough, there is no such thing as the "right" way to d=
o
>> anything. But I still think punishing users who use SPV wallets is =E2=80=
=8Ba
>> less-than-ideal way to incentive people to run full nodes. Right now=20
>> SPV is
>> the best way that exists for mobile phones to participate in the=20
>> network in
>> a decentralized way. This proposal makes the user experience for mobile
>> wallets a little more confusing and annoying.
>=20
> Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who=20=

> would provide the nodes they would need connect to? The decentralization=20=

> fairy?
>=20
> There's absolutely no reason that paying for connectivity would be any=20
> more confusing or annoying than transaction fees are.
>=20
> If some full nodes in the network started offering paid connection=20
> slots, that would just mean that users who checked the "pay subscription=20=

> fee" box in their wallet configuration would have an easier time=20
> connecting than the users who did't, just like how your transaction=20
> might eventually get mined without a fee but paying one makes it faster=20=

> and more probable.
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf