Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VABJ6-0000U2-IO for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 04:06:36 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.41; envelope-from=melvincarvalho@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f41.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1VABJ4-00060J-6p for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 04:06:36 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ec20so1086616lab.14 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:06:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.2.201 with SMTP id 9mr15797181law.20.1376625987511; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.159.233 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:06:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 06:06:27 +0200 Message-ID: From: Melvin Carvalho To: Gavin Andresen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c6760f96dce04e408b6c0 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (melvincarvalho[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1VABJ4-00060J-6p Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Gavin's post-0.9 TODO list... X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 04:06:36 -0000 --089e013c6760f96dce04e408b6c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 16 August 2013 03:00, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Mike asked what non-0.9 code I'm working on; the three things on the top > of my list are: > > 1) Smarter fee handling on the client side, instead of hard-coded fees. I > was busy today generating scatter-plots and histograms of transaction fees > versus priorities to get some insight into what miner policies look like > right now. > +1 > > 2) "First double-spend" relaying and alerting, to better support low-value > in-person transactions. Related: > *Have *a *Snack*, Pay with *Bitcoins* > > +1 > > 3) Work on 2-3 whitepapers on why we need to increase or remove the 1MB > block size limit, how we can do it safely, and go through all of the > arguments that have been made against it and explain why they're wrong. > What block size do you think is ideal? > > -- > -- > Gavin Andresen > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! > It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. > Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > --089e013c6760f96dce04e408b6c0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On 16 August 2013 03:00, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail= .com> wrote:
Mike asked what non-0.9 cod= e I'm working on; the three things on the top of my list are:

<= /div>
1) Smarter fee handling on the client side, instead of hard-coded fees= . I was busy today generating scatter-plots and histograms of transaction f= ees versus priorities to get some insight into what miner policies look lik= e right now.

+1
=A0
<= div dir=3D"ltr">

2) "First double-spend" relaying and alerting= , to better support low-value in-person transactions. =A0Related:=A0
<= h3 style=3D"margin:0px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-weight:normal;font-size:= 16px;font-family:Arial,sans-serif"> Have=A0a=A0Sna= ck, Pay with=A0Bitcoins=A0

+1
=A0
<= div dir=3D"ltr">

3) Work on 2-3 whitepapers on why we need to increase o= r remove the 1MB block size limit, how we can do it safely, and go through = all of the arguments that have been made against it and explain why they= 9;re wrong.

What block size do you think is idea= l?
=A0
<= div>

--
--
Gavin Andresen


-----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam= pad/clk?id=3D48897031&iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk
___________________= ____________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment


--089e013c6760f96dce04e408b6c0--