Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF98BB36 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:16:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149058.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149058.authsmtp.co.uk [62.13.149.58]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5942A5 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt16.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7PKGmKx008814; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:16:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from muck ([50.58.157.74]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7PKGhZT055024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:16:46 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:16:43 -0700 From: Peter Todd To: Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20150825201643.GC11083@muck> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Server-Quench: 36823e63-4b66-11e5-b398-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR bgdMdAcUGUATAgsB AmMbWVVeUVt7XWQ7 bgpPaA1DY09JQQJu T01BRU1TWkFvYWd2 XnR6Uhx3dwdCNnd3 YUIsXXZTXkcvc0Vg RhxSE3AHZDJldTIc WUhFdwNWdQpKLx5A PgF4GhFYa3VsNCMk FAgyOXU9MCtqYAhE RAgILFkbRUIaVhU7 QQwYGjErEEFNbSQv JBsnLBY2GEEaMQ0J MEksEXcRI1c5AxU8 V3JnIRcRfkkRD29j IRlTU1IreAAA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 50.58.157.74/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, greg@xiph.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap [BIP 1xx - Draft] X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:16:51 -0000 --PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 05:19:28PM +0800, Chun Wang via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Proposal 1 looks good, but tx fee collected can be manipulated by > miners. I like the idea next block collect the tx fee from previous > block. What would you think of an approach like John Dillon's proposal to explicitly give the economic majority of coin holders a vote for the max blocksize? Miners could still vote BIP100 style for what max they were willing to use, limited in turn by the vote of the economic majority. I think in principle that would give all parties a clear voice in the matter, which in turn makes whatever the result is more legitimit and less controversial. --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000013a6653562bcb4bda7570118635eeaa8597108576bc9733b --PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJV3M0oXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAxM2E2NjUzNTYyYmNiNGJkYTc1NzAxMTg2MzVlZWFhODU5 NzEwODU3NmJjOTczM2IvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQwIXyHOf0udzLPQf/cJNgS2g9tEizZgwdT/8NRhMR dd16hCdWaLGQ+C+ZV7/F0wN0ofYf5zPe6aVMPJAVxVMeuo8ekxrsCeO7lrH0FStd kg8URnzgyFprWMi/JhD02ZWQHO8W40dQy71i7W/RTzgWQj1oUbTdzYDpvZea0cx4 ZtlAFIyogxzSSA5IHlzJA+ni/BAgitLLMUune62aG2W6M1uDY+R+p3jU8TBFPf+w eUYP5ojbbN3kDsxzLRm1gUZDiKGJ5dOWMhLQmQAXeLF7q0O/u94sSe+IUuAuWD/D SttG+DAHBNEuAQuA7EMoc8Ph9Ustqm5Ch6tl4IGy1ddzzFi0cph58zulk8H3Nw== =zSp6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PuGuTyElPB9bOcsM--