Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.213.177 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.213.177; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ig0-f177.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5363D9FD.4070509@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
References: <CA+s+GJARfPhMo8ucE7E40bE890NsuzuWPq1DQuK6ZVMvps0LVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<535BECDC.9070804@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
	<CA+s+GJC_1YzKNwQKSreWB73vZVMYmM=+CqonqP7XWcDFP7ZZLw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5363D9FD.4070509@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 20:28:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJCOdoO0STE-pcGC+dSLxbSmw07T=Uuv50RBeHVP36uuwQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: Kristov Atlas <author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Compatibility Bitcoin-Qt with Tails
Precedence: list

On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Kristov Atlas
<author@anonymousbitcoinbook.com> wrote:
> Nice work! I can confirm that this dev binary runs smoothly in the latest

Thanks for testing!

> version of Tails, v1.0. Screenshot proof here [1]. When this is incorporated
> into the next release of Bitcoin Core, will this make the usual Linux binary
> compatible, or will there be a special binary just for systems running the
> older Qt?

The normal binary will be compatible.

At some point we may add a binary that is linked to Qt 5.x as well for
newer distributions, but compatibility is most important.

Wladimir