Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <tier.nolan@gmail.com>) id 1Wd2Pc-0006QW-72 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:52 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.44; envelope-from=tier.nolan@gmail.com; helo=mail-qa0-f44.google.com; Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wd2PW-0007Kv-Vz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:52 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hw13so1267518qab.31 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:00:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.27.212 with SMTP id 78mr62428466qgx.18.1398279641515; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.25.86 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:00:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53580A73.9070208@gk2.sk> References: <CANEZrP2hbBVGqytmXR1rAcVama4ONnR586Se-Ch=dsxOzy2O4w@mail.gmail.com> <53344FF8.7030204@gk2.sk> <CAPg+sBhbx5vy_hewAkFPaiXHzSMNH0qLhEYGjPmQMjR5StP-tw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJna-Hi0JnrF2_rUx0rGkdnsuCoaD01e3Gobpn+QqbL=D1Uivg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJna-HirtsGLfAhfUf9dAYEGWo6g=o=eAU187c2pdW8vDFGkPw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPg+sBg8wDH9yTUoyhRbuzVtbD8hGxya8tOnV4pMToHy3gLrzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJna-HiN_1KQmpDJFFX6mGvM63RC0xwXxvfuorpihnzYf4=fsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJna-HgfpyHX_0AHwt1Hkj0qhD_-xOcpxsZ9KXq=7CPgwse1hA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPg+sBguSQ8dk1xXKinX+ez4BmdM3sz-huruuhD6NCTsp0kRBQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJna-Hib6umrkG0pAQzQvsyBMxOU6P675TURsVuWSU_ci9+X_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPg+sBiwzfXDAM0FKsBPi8d6E5y_nK5FDyfPvPhOTAA+f8654Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJna-HhPm0U2odPgRji7zJqCZCWuXKT_=ayC2tsajjRX5TiCXg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJna-Hh2t-E=fm9V0EH+qOQTx+qsmcBemEJmML0G9PgsrJr5eg@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-z3OVCL34FMECHDC3d8OiRKYhVSkzZFU0cGHV0ifu09bCbJA@mail.gmail.com> <53580A73.9070208@gk2.sk> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:00:41 +0100 Message-ID: <CAE-z3OUMp_uO07+_R_x2yRLbSCzK1J5isbVUYEY3KF4Tx16K2Q@mail.gmail.com> From: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com> To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c14d6654493904f7ba5975 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tier.nolan[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Wd2PW-0007Kv-Vz Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:52 -0000 --001a11c14d6654493904f7ba5975 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk> wrote: > > > Setting the gap limit to high is just a small extra cost in that case. > > Not if you have 100 accounts on 10 different devices. > I meant for a merchant with a server that is handing out hundreds of addresses. The point is to have a single system that is compatible over a large number of systems. --001a11c14d6654493904f7ba5975 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W= ed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Pavol Rusnak <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"= mailto:stick@gk2.sk" target=3D"_blank">stick@gk2.sk</a>></span> wrote:<b= r><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:= 1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div class=3D""><br> > Setting the gap limit to high is just a small extra cost in that case.= <br> <br> </div>Not if you have 100 accounts on 10 different devices.<br></blockquote= ><div><br></div><div>I meant for a merchant with a server that is handing o= ut hundreds of addresses.<br></div><div>=C2=A0<br></div><div>The point is t= o have a single system that is compatible over a large number of systems.<b= r> </div></div></div></div> --001a11c14d6654493904f7ba5975--