Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XmV4J-0001Js-5f for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 21:58:15 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1XmV4H-0000Mu-9k for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 21:58:15 +0000 Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.0.100]); authenticated by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1XmV4A-0000e3-Fi; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:58:06 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D72777B7-D5E5-48AB-9BE6-BE0E8034D958"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Tamas Blummer In-Reply-To: <20141106213215.GA12918@savin.petertodd.org> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 22:58:04 +0100 Message-Id: References: <20141106213215.GA12918@savin.petertodd.org> To: Peter Todd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1415311093; 2eda0ef2; X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.237.132.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Headers-End: 1XmV4H-0000Mu-9k Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The difficulty of writing consensus critical code: the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 21:58:15 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D72777B7-D5E5-48AB-9BE6-BE0E8034D958 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks Peter, Having tried to write a bug-for-bug compatible code with Satoshi, I can = only second that it is rather close to impossible.=20 The aim of BIP62 is noble, still it does not feel right for me to = increase the complexity of the code with e.g. soft-fork-ready = versioning. Freezing the consensus code, studying its bugs appears more appropriate = to me. What we learn could define a hard fork or a better chain we migrate to as discussed by blockstream. Tamas Blummer --Apple-Mail=_D72777B7-D5E5-48AB-9BE6-BE0E8034D958 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUW+7sAAoJEPZykcUXcTkc1FgH/2dzFdqKzRt+RWQKDL70hfoD Ed3jBooSPfDf2mIxfBvTywMHUSDrun2puqaWFLHvJoFNp2rGUWDujMETd1Ax950Z euFk2UDOmoBE1qXIy0ZqRzxcKuC7Jvs9kaGxIqRc1zgADwd8f5b0p+YB+8nsLHdc TQ86bnT66nVXPbGO+qyGQQsjwJohkVqwP2NSv/Oow/5D2c+a6tB5EyaDwJCdWqAX DfOoWv5JdjLa2XcawvJt4Kr4U40prxVo1H1khZjt3VbVab/bqZX3iXitSe9dbHOv 5uxyQt2t3pJL9kqMnDw4S91Z33Q+EIBAQaaXciV7qZ/Qzx7VrA3BURW5l5GEGCs= =I8UD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_D72777B7-D5E5-48AB-9BE6-BE0E8034D958--