Return-Path: <slashene@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141CC895
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:34:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com (mail-la0-f50.google.com
	[209.85.215.50])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD5515F
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:34:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lagz9 with SMTP id z9so29202535lag.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
	bh=73DzmDqF45Z1Nxz0A8yOk0Ltr5Mnwh73I9eNRJRV5aY=;
	b=YBfQSYiONigufrgrCMWE6MW2yXcL4OJPfsEcjQ/lV3j1rYC0DjerwmTWZDGVYYQZF4
	5wIR1uhpChb6+ApYgY3ItTxngdXcopHrSryd+BstiRpL3aH6y67yywXYmoExNWwCqjBP
	UQfZtdafrsDkwPhelYn9rDd2ZKU8qac5sb1VB/65w7wo5Z86BiLK2NinFkTp0+jknk69
	3zP4kICvEhmd8OXG7EGe/uh5lW1hF0wdE6zznSCvHpa4xjuxzr+F9kGU/1APm69moqOt
	xmf9ecin98Yz2Zs/6kHNjTfS/21Fovf5+cqRNIq8CEDHt+FnjC+2eatrlrfEoRrZyUaC
	pw5A==
X-Received: by 10.112.63.169 with SMTP id h9mr37131565lbs.104.1439483662626;
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: slashene@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.142.15 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 01:34:03 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ltCAEOnTM96uxFS8hN-8RAZQbdE
Message-ID: <CA+1nnrmkEGHY7HwffbQ4sEG_c2EhCbVK64FtGXSERpGdsxoQZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3fd125ef647051d33e8c2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP-draft] CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - An opcode for
 relative locktime (Btc Drak)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:34:25 -0000

--001a11c3fd125ef647051d33e8c2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Would be wonderful to have this pushed together with CLTV and BIP68.
If BIP68 get pushed in the next fork, this CSV is a no brainer.

Was there a competing RCLTV implementation somewhere that did not depend on
BIP68 for information ? I don't manage to find it.

--001a11c3fd125ef647051d33e8c2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Would be wonderful to have this pushed together with CLTV =
and BIP68.<br><div>If BIP68 get pushed in the next fork, this CSV is a no b=
rainer.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Was there a competing RCLTV implementa=
tion somewhere that did not depend on BIP68 for information ? I don&#39;t m=
anage to find it.<br></div></div>

--001a11c3fd125ef647051d33e8c2--