Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XHbOt-0006WF-NN for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:27:47 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.180; envelope-from=u20024804@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f180.google.com; Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1XHbOp-0003aj-NF for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:27:47 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id v6so8376108lbi.39 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:27:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.147.74 with SMTP id ti10mr5312268lbb.29.1407947256923; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:27:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: u20024804@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.4.68 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:27:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "KingK.Pan" Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:27:16 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LhHnBCrn690gKIDmoO0gfgeF6go Message-ID: To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a84be1c8eaa050085440c X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kingk.pan[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (u20024804[at]gmail.com) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1XHbOp-0003aj-NF Subject: [Bitcoin-development] What is the danger if bitcoind startted with -flushwallet=false ? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:27:47 -0000 --047d7b3a84be1c8eaa050085440c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi everybody, I tried to reduce the IO of bitcoind, and I found '-flushwallet=false'. After trying it, my IO reduced greatly. But why 'flushwallet' is true by default? Is there any danger if closing the flush wallet thread? I lost all my coins in testnet after one crash with '-flushwallet=false', was this because of no flush wallet thread? -- Qing Qing Pan okcoin.com --047d7b3a84be1c8eaa050085440c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everyb= ody,

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 I tried= to reduce the IO of bitcoind, and I found '-flushwallet=3Dfalse'. = After trying it, my IO reduced greatly.
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 But why= 'flushwallet' is true by default? Is there any danger if closing t= he flush wallet thread?
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 I lost = all my coins in testnet after one crash with '-flushwallet=3Dfalse'= , was this because of no flush wallet thread?




=C2=A0 --
=C2=A0 Qing Qing Pan
=C2=A0 okcoin.com
--047d7b3a84be1c8eaa050085440c--