Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of ozlabs.org
	designates 103.22.144.67 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=103.22.144.67; envelope-from=rusty@ozlabs.org;
	helo=ozlabs.org; 
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Kristov Atlas <kristovatlas.lists@gmail.com>,
	Bitcoin development mailing list
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAGH37SK0k1YUvadetyHcBGjzW+OHNFRmRwqsUDeHBGejUacigQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGH37SK0k1YUvadetyHcBGjzW+OHNFRmRwqsUDeHBGejUacigQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 07:12:14 +0930
Message-ID: <877fr4ejih.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction
	Inputs and Outputs
Precedence: list

Kristov Atlas <kristovatlas.lists@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I have written a draft of a BIP to standardize the sorting of tx inputs and
> outputs for privacy and security reasons. A few colleagues have reviewed
> this and provided feedback privately, but now it's ready for feedback from
> a wider audience.
>
> If there is positive sentiment about the proposal after feedback is
> integrated, I aim for a bip number to be assigned and have it accepted into
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips

OK, I've modified my implementation to match your proposal:

        https://github.com/rustyrussell/bitcoin/tree/bip-69

It compiles, and is fairly trivial, but will need some testing.

Cheers,
Rusty.