Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29EB994D for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:56:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com (mail-qk0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0167B1D4 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t127so39052880qkf.1 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:56:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=F0UwbEt58vhOGmW+vCe4TwPrTrgBefcMNCdtPOhzpoc=; b=ORlH2/exVob81Ze82VtKBuw8NLgayGbQkNNcuTWHPg9JsX3AazHM6y2NZZmUD8Scj1 U5BfC/AKvb6sNH/s/RpkijRxnpj3G3TP/7kH4+/X2+H8yPnBDqSameH/rfoXzo6+pR3r P8IwRv1dKspm+leHssCVNMVdhB0S05rC9ef3P8GSgnD7pbnjvpcNW/4DVvzEMjq5j7Nv txqg0QDNt9a25EV3gO79yL8Qc/OhLtb8JXWt2v41GKwhwALMyHlg42ayt5uoBB2ZLIsG ivmGqbU+Ch38CJNI7IcgXgdStIAxPBdSvoZ1SGEUOPaOjKM8qGzxTOBNgEdfIYryz4i/ WQzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=F0UwbEt58vhOGmW+vCe4TwPrTrgBefcMNCdtPOhzpoc=; b=UwxJOm+DA0G+BBoCk2RDa5Zfbn0N0qiTr2EWIvPwwgQcBKo3/Del+ZTjqgeDUc62EF xr0PK2pFTRP59xeWHkx+zGJAin7GcAk3HRU2UQ2nWYb6TWi/R3342eGYqDbqLuKZKETk Lp5VQpEQK3SAKswUd7Dux886a74C2ntVlqNpZtUbWd0na+tC18O/40i8LsZL7WQIqTZ2 BR8V0SIR8OVv3A3VUNvMmCmqSwR9rz728qNDGhBxbg9LcdeXusSkmOqxZHy2QIZMj+MM kCdJyUWCNXW+poRy5ypqiGVS8ogOhJKBS7IuOdPYglAgpm+h37cJvELVeSRSy429wr3f JdHg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK0lXaAPuqqoWCGiqtz6dYBj/HtfGhEnu800zy5rhJ8UqOIbd3CVZO8VYA2AsPAsx91DfEVv3ekOA311w== X-Received: by 10.55.165.4 with SMTP id o4mr31509665qke.15.1466542609828; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:56:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: James MacWhyte Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:56:40 +0000 Message-ID: To: Erik Aronesty , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fac884e92490535d00ff5 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:56:52 -0000 --001a114fac884e92490535d00ff5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks for starting this discussion, Erik. > Should this be a new BIP? I know netki's BIP75 is out there - but I think > it's too specific and too reliant on the domain name system. > This is not quite accurate. BIP75 is designed to be independent of any name resolution system. You could use it with a static URL that you share, for example, or even use it to implement a mesh-network payment system over bluetooth. Netki's wallet names do use DNS, but that isn't related to this discussion. What BIP75 *does* do is provide a way for a client to get a new payment address for every payment. I personally think it is better than BIP47 for the uses you mentioned (subscriptions, etc). I'm glad you brought up identity methods other than x509. At breadwallet we are thinking about how to establish the most universal system, and letting users identify themselves with any of a selection of identity systems is ideal. I think the pki_data slot should be constantly expanded to allow new identity types, but they should be explained/standardized in the BIPs that add them and use universal names. "netki://" wouldn't be appropriate, for example, if their method is open sourced and possibly used by others--it should instead be given a product name like "dnswallet://" or something more clever. James --001a114fac884e92490535d00ff5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for starting this discussion, Erik.


Should this be a new BIP?=C2=A0 I know netki's BIP75 i= s out there - but I think it's too specific and too reliant on the doma= in name system.
=C2=A0
This i= s not quite accurate. BIP75 is designed to be independent of any name resol= ution system. You could use it with a static URL that you share, for exampl= e, or even use it to implement a mesh-network payment system over bluetooth= . Netki's wallet names do use DNS, but that isn't related to this d= iscussion.

What BIP75 *does* d= o is provide a way for a client to get a new payment address for every paym= ent. I personally think it is better than BIP47 for the uses you mentioned = (subscriptions, etc).

I'm glad you brought up identity methods other than x50= 9. At breadwallet we are thinking about how to establish the most universal= system, and letting users identify themselves with any of a selection of i= dentity systems is ideal. I think the pki_data slot should be constantly ex= panded to allow new identity types, but they should be explained/standardiz= ed in the BIPs that add them and use universal names. "netki://" wouldn't be appropriate, for example, i= f their method is open sourced and possibly used by others--it should inste= ad be given a product name like "dnswallet://" or something more = clever.

James


--001a114fac884e92490535d00ff5--