Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1Z5a04-0004Ms-K8 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:37:00 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.43; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f43.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z5a03-0000f9-Lx for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:37:00 +0000 Received: by wgfq1 with SMTP id q1so17323998wgf.1 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:36:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.104.197 with SMTP id gg5mr65577267wib.27.1434634613699; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.14.196 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:36:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150618114757.GB6690@amethyst.visucore.com> References: <55828737.6000007@riseup.net> <CANEZrP3M7+BsZKLFZV-0A_fC7NmMGbTDxsx3ywru3dSW78ZskQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150618111407.GA6690@amethyst.visucore.com> <20150618114757.GB6690@amethyst.visucore.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:36:53 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iCMEXvz4wQBJ1jFSkCnFsOfRfxQ Message-ID: <CANEZrP0Y5T2_e=TEeYr1R-Gke15_6dJBN+vgFG5Z34YfY4AKmw@mail.gmail.com> From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> To: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" <laanwj@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041825bc8839af0518cae607 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z5a03-0000f9-Lx Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:37:00 -0000 --f46d041825bc8839af0518cae607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > And allegations that the project is "run like wikipedia" or "an edit war" > are verifyably untrue. > Check the commit history. > This was a reference to a post by Gregory on Reddit where he said if Gavin were to do a pull request for the block size change and then merge it, he would revert it. And I fully believe he would do so! --f46d041825bc8839af0518cae607 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo= ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c= cc solid;padding-left:1ex">And allegations that the project is "run li= ke wikipedia" or "an edit war" are verifyably untrue.<br> Check the commit history.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This was a re= ference to a post by Gregory on Reddit where he said if Gavin were to do a = pull request for the block size change and then merge it, he would revert i= t. And I fully believe he would do so!</div></div></div></div> --f46d041825bc8839af0518cae607--