Return-Path: <tensiam@hotmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 807FC3BC5
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:29:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	(mail-oln040092070014.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.70.14])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F22CE7
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:29:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com;
	s=selector1;
	h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;
	bh=pEf3GLD0l8SWqT6uYnBg9UGbs1Y/o3oFwbphRStEFoM=;
	b=bn+W7GT/XHiLsL0UyX4droYA1UcMtPIDtBaiCeHbdT/ZsmJDxKnDegb/2sLfCFrXxDd5XjVp+vF/CwjzfOJaYD7MTaZ3GJVHklvYATRa1SnFnoELn2wY6YuMBBTDK0ZpzDiyYmJB36EH18EiU815nnIxDCWOwW9LLzn5bYRPm+nbxOyUY6Eq6qd2Em2jFSTTPACuHBvR2lNbUv8faM6yMShhcBs0xNynTTMoTVLf0sfV86r08F8PCwwZYQefqaMOrozgyThsyk+xtzereqkID3ZzhPGMAL/BT6ubNZBbzJ/+chWHHr0pPE5Fsr1KdMr8x8CYpF9nW8/MhjGDqgz4xw==
Received: from VE1EUR03FT045.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
	(10.152.18.59) by VE1EUR03HT008.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com
	(10.152.18.127) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
	cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.2052.18;
	Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:28:58 +0000
Received: from DB6PR10MB1832.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.18.58) by
	VE1EUR03FT045.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.19.51) with Microsoft
	SMTP
	Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id
	15.20.2052.18 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:28:58 +0000
Received: from DB6PR10MB1832.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
	([fe80::cc12:47f0:aa33:6b70]) by
	DB6PR10MB1832.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
	([fe80::cc12:47f0:aa33:6b70%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2115.005;
	Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:28:58 +0000
From: "Kenshiro []" <tensiam@hotmail.com>
To: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Thread-Topic: Add a moving checkpoint to the Bitcoin protocol
Thread-Index: AQHVR5sdyaW9NUkjL067/8euo+yr/A==
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:28:58 +0000
Message-ID: <DB6PR10MB1832329BC8D151DC18F1E6CEA6DF0@DB6PR10MB1832.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: en-US, es-ES
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:6E24234FECA2B9C89FE841E820A4C6805BBCE5A9B45B085A6A717DFB54F1F700;
	UpperCasedChecksum:8D488100C5302FB1331EBE57A61F29A952DD14CF1A2B98EB5A8CA11BDDA85D92;
	SizeAsReceived:6584; Count:40
x-tmn: [bTtA79fVNEKNiNFvH3UEAtsWnSobndi/]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 40
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0;
	RULEID:(2390118)(5050001)(7020095)(20181119110)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322404)(2017031323274)(2017031324274)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045);
	SRVR:VE1EUR03HT008; 
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1EUR03HT008:
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: gl4ssVlpR4eNp+IjMUhVG8Yao6UduWeUc/RX/wCGFNjZ/a4olB6sNVskE+iKG4ZOZzQJhicvrB2wpmF8UruvWHD8K/oEddc2tH5vNqh2ibU28hG/j7yFssx2CwEOo/pIYb/NfXZfGNLMW7Sw49BkCUYNT+E8Ap8o6Wvzax1GhSmL+bqfh22w2y8OCxy71ls2
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_000_DB6PR10MB1832329BC8D151DC18F1E6CEA6DF0DB6PR10MB1832EURP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5429f6de-7ad2-4f3b-c1c8-08d715b2a98d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Jul 2019 12:28:58.7667 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1EUR03HT008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 13:17:33 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Add a moving checkpoint to the Bitcoin protocol
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:29:02 -0000

--_000_DB6PR10MB1832329BC8D151DC18F1E6CEA6DF0DB6PR10MB1832EURP_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

I would like to propose that a "moving checkpoint" is added to the Bitcoin =
protocol. It's a very simple rule already implemented in NXT coin:

- A node will ignore any new block under nodeBlockHeight - N, so the blockc=
hain becomes truly immutable after N blocks, even during a 51% attack which=
 thanks to the moving checkpoint can't rewrite history older than the last =
N blocks.

NXT coin has a N value of 720 blocks, like 12 hours of blocks.

To be more conservative, Bitcoin could have a N value of 144 blocks (like 2=
4 hours). So users and exchanges could plan their operations with big amoun=
ts of BTC knowing that only after 24 hours a transaction is truly immutable=
.

Maybe a 51% attack never happens but if it does it would be nice to be 100%=
 sure that history rewrite is limited to only 24 hours.

Regards,

--_000_DB6PR10MB1832329BC8D151DC18F1E6CEA6DF0DB6PR10MB1832EURP_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-=
1">
<style type=3D"text/css" style=3D"display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bo=
ttom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir=3D"ltr">
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Hi all,&nbsp;</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
I would like to propose that a &quot;moving checkpoint&quot; is added to th=
e Bitcoin protocol. It's a very simple rule already implemented in NXT coin=
:&nbsp;</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
-&nbsp;A node will ignore any new block under nodeBlockHeight - N, so the b=
lockchain becomes truly immutable after N blocks, even during a 51% attack =
which thanks to the moving checkpoint can't rewrite history older than the =
last N blocks.
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
NXT coin has a N value of 720 blocks, like 12 hours of blocks.&nbsp;</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
To be more conservative, Bitcoin could have a N value of 144 blocks (like 2=
4 hours). So users and exchanges could plan their operations with big amoun=
ts of BTC knowing that only after 24 hours a transaction is truly immutable=
.&nbsp;</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Maybe a 51% attack never happens but if it does it would be nice to be 100%=
 sure that history rewrite is limited to only 24 hours.</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style=3D"font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;=
 color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<span style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-s=
erif; font-size: 12pt;">Regards,</span><br>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_DB6PR10MB1832329BC8D151DC18F1E6CEA6DF0DB6PR10MB1832EURP_--