Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jouke@bitonic.nl>) id 1W4USp-0001MY-DF
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:53:23 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitonic.nl
	designates 178.22.57.41 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=178.22.57.41; envelope-from=jouke@bitonic.nl;
	helo=mail.entix.nl; 
Received: from mail.entix.nl ([178.22.57.41])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1W4USn-0006by-VH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:53:23 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.entix.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7889308EB8
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:34:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.entix.nl ([178.22.57.41])
	by localhost (entix.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id faLHa5Fy3wQM
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:34:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.24] (specht [92.64.70.65])
	by mail.entix.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 067AA308EB3
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:34:42 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52DA66D1.1040409@bitonic.nl>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:34:41 +0100
From: Jouke Hofman <jouke@bitonic.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CA+s+GJBo7iUEJTfJw2e6qcDmdHNGdDN442Svs5ikVyUL1Jm0Wg@mail.gmail.com>	<201401161523.38623.luke@dashjr.org>	<CA+s+GJDeV9-djdEsA_stznNK9zzBA_0xQFV_m6tVygJicuLWuQ@mail.gmail.com>	<201401171841.37790.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAJHLa0MVY6f02hK1CofM7bjLM=V1V0XKCWvHjBz=ozQdvA+xYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<52D99AD0.60707@monetize.io>
In-Reply-To: <52D99AD0.60707@monetize.io>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1W4USn-0006by-VH
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.9rc1 release schedule
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:53:23 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We rebroadcast incoming transactions without fees at several nodes,
including bc.info, to keep them in mempools.

On 01/17/2014 10:04 PM, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> CPFP is *extremely* important. People have lost money because this 
> feature is missing. I think it's critical that it makes it into
> 0.9
> 
> If I get a low-priority donation from a blockchain.info wallet,
> that money can disappear if it doesn't make it into a block in 24
> hours - bc.i will forget the transaction and happily respend its
> inputs on the next transaction that user makes.
> 
> I wouldn't mind paying $1 in fees to receive a $50 donation. But 
> without CPFP there's no way to do that.
> 
> 
> On 01/17/2014 12:53 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> <vendor hat: on>  BitPay sure would like to see CPFP in
>> upstream.
> 
>> I think the main hurdle to merging was that various people 
>> disagreed on various edge case handling and implementation
>> details, but no fundamental objections.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For 
> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In
> Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
> 
_______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list 
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS2mbQAAoJEIilnEpWGBYhH+8H/2nIZjrrZIPi/4ZeTi71cZOe
78oD4mzWM9zvRbjbGfIWrgTnkRQi4OQ/GorbRiyoAeKzAQ+SdeY8dkRsS14zpqpC
w4efoJOTxgi69giBWGPWlPvAtTwD65EcfJmUs5XeGi7J/3E0qTyry6sDu8t2ip84
hLUnqMOcNhc0J/k0KvBbEyl1YXcRWMjz5X2pMtY9yeMk+qFQPR1+RjZ+91OCRyui
Z47jhHlbhc5daXAWrq4fb54uNSJWUnYky7yN2pDTovAVq5PNNVNJTdxbjXSyYmcP
FwFNkARrgXRlSvf07FN991aa2u4CTkjRgA9uRrvcTtLXr8g2F0yymfPr0AQrgZg=
=J9Z4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----