Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QmVwm-00054n-Iy for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:08:40 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1QmVwh-0003DI-On for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:08:40 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-67-77-87-241.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [67.77.87.241]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E17683AA040; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:08:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:08:08 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <4E31ADCA.1040600@speakeasy.net> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107281508.11099.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1QmVwh-0003DI-On Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Forking personal "vanity" versions... X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:08:40 -0000 On Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:49:07 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Alan Grimes wrote: > > To those who think there are too many vanity versions of bitcoin, all I > > have to say is this: > > There is a 'vanity version' that removes the use of libdb or somehow > magically requires you to not have its development headers installed > on your system? You'll get that error even with the headers installed, because the makefile doesn't add the proper include paths to GCC. To build, I first: sed -i s/static/dynamic/ makefile.unix # because static libraries aren't standard on my OS (nor should they be) Then: make -f makefile.unix DEBUGFLAGS="-I/usr/include/db4.8 -ggdb -O0" \ -j4 USE_UPNP=1 bitcoind