Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0CEF1A1C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  5 Oct 2015 22:56:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
	[209.85.212.181])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 299A319E
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  5 Oct 2015 22:56:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so135156312wic.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=jEHiDLJ02HAE9nLOXyXbhk5yQxUChDHAGCtjU9rFL1I=;
	b=MobTqTVZfJMzrCyU7JDwymYe/ffESUdypJOx+IZcAafgIKILpEvuPFmrXEJPm+iO8H
	4BnimiNeA0Eo5KeyZ7qjMBj7CXt+YrOKNedDN0UBdQ+Iskr1yPNmF9l/vbWnL2lWk1fU
	sFzpzuuhHLSX4v6NAo07KDXA5GRjneM8CI7aB/uiELK3HrBXThmVAUAinddet5D+Q3YZ
	JY9ZF/FJ/kExl2xW42KTFKfgMOrkCf17GCMKGY//xvBXdmWEVPV3OZBPYrrx95nxVWyO
	wOtmjUMea19F6CPA9ZlKA0607DAVAcKKiBzO/Ix2nJ6EzOxpvzUtZQF2Q1e19exjGkmD
	5sHg==
X-Received: by 10.180.75.38 with SMTP id z6mr12883583wiv.36.1444085806785;
	Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.21.200 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5570C084-0C2D-4B79-A78E-B25699600EA9@gmx.com>
References: <CAKzdR-rPoByn=+CgsTc1ZnLkjwtYyJnbQLbn-VHOvz0dLciefQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+w+GKSNa3TWgHXrp3=3gXdAbE6vVjW_uzus3_2YG9gzKJSskg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5612ACF3.2080006@gmail.com>
	<5570C084-0C2D-4B79-A78E-B25699600EA9@gmx.com>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:56:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMzscJZZ_k19KN67UC9gYM_3J-serKNPVq_gro4-85exL3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter R <peter_r@gmx.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c06c289ec240521636d6c
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
	HK_RANDOM_FROM, 
	HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork
 technical debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:56:48 -0000

--f46d043c06c289ec240521636d6c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I also agree with Mike that Core's requirement for unanimous consensus
> results in development grid lock and should be revisited.
>

There is no development gridlock. Look at the IRC logs for core-dev; look
at the pull requests; look a the merge history: Development is vibrant.
Developers are very active. You are manufacturing a crisis convenient to
your narrative, but it is far from the actual reality on the ground.

Please desist from this intellectual dishonesty and toxicity.

--f46d043c06c289ec240521636d6c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On M=
on, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<=
a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">b=
itcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1p=
x;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1=
ex"><div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word"><div><div>I also agree with Mike th=
at Core&#39;s requirement for unanimous consensus results in development gr=
id lock and should be revisited.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></d=
iv><div>There is no development gridlock. Look at the IRC logs for core-dev=
; look at the pull requests; look a the merge history: Development is vibra=
nt. Developers are very active. You are manufacturing a crisis convenient t=
o your narrative, but it is far from the actual reality on the ground.</div=
><div><br></div><div>Please desist from this intellectual dishonesty and to=
xicity.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><d=
iv><br></div></div></div></div>

--f46d043c06c289ec240521636d6c--