Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE18C002B for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9C94017A for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:39:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org DD9C94017A Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mail.wpsoftware.net header.i=@mail.wpsoftware.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=evxzdyB0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.107 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id calEN44fs4ce for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:39:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 3402B400EF Received: from mail.wpsoftware.net (unknown [66.183.0.205]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3402B400EF for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from camus (camus-andrew.lan [192.168.0.190]) by mail.wpsoftware.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8657400FE; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:39:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.wpsoftware.net; s=default; t=1676677152; bh=48mDuS+fQGZGn2rtUzH5bj8raqJIaj3kbs+JOuN3FAg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=evxzdyB0+BNSqM0L1sx7O9TPyAL2kfU64kG+YAFZqrWEMF6TAutHYnKWdqG38RK+Q LQCI33f8JTcZF0dPkUA/vePO/6HvFWizsRQFBWQ3TqH9IzjxmptYEFsXENF4LZxoEz h7Mj8rSFBunxI1uDjFuDm4a8JSlHqHRIRPDMc0YjyRdM9hCv1jHqy2xjkXllJKW1p3 CHh40V5ZcztHPKFg8mvq7yf1ajWux7GhSgSbVZ+nwO2rMV5H0f/+33LkL76+V5EJBa u4LuQhm/HO0h7BoCjxv9S+YIJ4ULTNbE9E6bgTDZJ3EjHTX+lpBnDACFzPqKdSwVki dITkWl7ApJnGw== Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:39:11 +0000 From: Andrew Poelstra To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: References: <177016307-23dca06637e70217317077657442d0d8@pmq7v.m5r2.onet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jdL/4IJj/twD2R2I" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testing censorship resistance of bitcoin p2p network X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:39:14 -0000 --jdL/4IJj/twD2R2I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:35:34PM +0000, Andrew Poelstra via bitcoin-dev w= rote: >=20 > If you ban any of these specific script fragments then spammers will > just use `IF ENDIF` and provide the `FALSE` as a zero push. > And banning *this* would ban legitimate use cases. > I realize this is confusingly worded. I mean, they'd provide the `FALSE` as a separate witness element rather than being part of the witnessScript. --=20 Andrew Poelstra Director of Research, Blockstream Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew The sun is always shining in space -Justin Lewis-Webster --jdL/4IJj/twD2R2I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEkPnKPD7Je+ki35VexYjWPOQbl8EFAmPwEB4ACgkQxYjWPOQb l8FtCAf9GjvNy7fA7WpSc8HdcwoqAdteLY4DRUNdC350JuFCFy3UXVP5Aa1QemIK FPoVWlQor+tuKhKjsUIwGduKDZqvyuB/P8JIGJml2lROEbUqavDG7LVfT7SO3wTN vd/gfA/IvdOWNa7fBJw2dPKlmYTRQLYlYkfDBl3amWJx2lWJuWyOLJxkQrbX9Eok iikL/5dpswBe2AFnBhlBnd214kr/eXdWd1ldYkDDN47MT2o9LEGp7JIxWrRfdhKh 9VywJvMC8kVOs8hfGTSCYawvyehMWctCgbTU6bmi8558/l+QcPjW1tFSQPIvy5UH 0K92Mb7Oy3XbF1sPjW+m+kxG1mFILA== =BmEx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jdL/4IJj/twD2R2I--