Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B831F16D2 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:25:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6BF38B for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so99943736wic.0 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:24:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+RfwIaZmqTJO3Hn9ReD9ZBhNIcz8Y/AHWm9IDnbh/B0=; b=efcCMY7WsxteQJz3SfoLApwi1IPfxkuFceKhKOviwOXKRT4m6hNr+zYWwlbi0M0B23 2MpVM3KogizEKiLMAahaOuFvvPtqEcKfZp49yyYTlO3qMXkE15gl/i4JiBLq5G1I6v+w 6S0WBhtilUrrsOoqy5/biEVopYhpZ06XUhvzwUyNMCxNaFuCIKgSG5j123W7c50Xwa5W H2rd4jpTLbq/NiRP8IBMucty+9iOLi2yrU1g6gletwBCp+0jg1DBvn7Vi72dUspKbDJW +JThxvNfVagUXZsqqnckQUvUfy9QGG1Q4vYHheqEE788PMY9cnUjEowGcp5TMWxBdxLe 1R1w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkZte3k5Rrji3qXSMJ9r7mlUe4TVhoCIlk+yzqD6hIYKq1JkyehImpXTSs6QQn2tvQIOvCJ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.120.198 with SMTP id le6mr21603276wjb.133.1442823899425; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.37.5 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.37.5 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:24:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8737y9iw04.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <87mvwqb132.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <87r3lyjewl.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <87eghwiu4k.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <8737y9iw04.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:24:58 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: Rusty Russell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01160002ffc8d705203d9d3e X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Version bits with timeout and delay. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:25:01 -0000 --089e01160002ffc8d705203d9d3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sep 20, 2015 10:58 PM, "Rusty Russell" wrote: > > Jorge Tim=C3=B3n writes: > > I disagree with the importance of this concern and old soft/hardforks will > > replace this activation mechanism with height, so that's an argument in > > favor of using the height from the start. This is "being discussed" in = a > > thread branched from bip99's discussion. > > Thanks, I'll have to dig through bitcoin-dev and find it. The initial thread is linked to from the BIP document (which is in the bitcoin/bips PR). --089e01160002ffc8d705203d9d3e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sep 20, 2015 10:58 PM, "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> writes:
> > I disagree with the importance of this concern and old soft/hardf= orks will
> > replace this activation mechanism with height, so that's an a= rgument in
> > favor of using the height from the start. This is "being dis= cussed" in a
> > thread branched from bip99's discussion.
>
> Thanks, I'll have to dig through bitcoin-dev and find it.

The initial thread is linked to from the BIP document (which= is in the bitcoin/bips PR).

--089e01160002ffc8d705203d9d3e--