Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VAtDW-0000Pr-Cv for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 02:59:46 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.148.96 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.148.96; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail148096.authsmtp.net; Received: from outmail148096.authsmtp.net ([62.13.148.96]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1VAtDU-0002FC-Ur for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 02:59:46 +0000 Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt9.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Kp) with ESMTP id r7I2xaWc071765; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:59:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r7I2xWZi039325 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:59:34 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 22:59:32 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Bitcoin Dev Message-ID: <20130818025932.GA372@savin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: 36c75f43-07b2-11e3-b5c5-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdwoUGUATAgsB AmUbW1deVVR7WmY7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq WVdMSlVNFUsqBmUD Tnl0CxlxfgZEfTBx bU9lXD5YWhd9cBB5 QVNUEj8EeGZhPWMC AkULch5UcAFPdx8U a1UrBXRDHxpzExUS OygUGngbHA03 X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1VAtDU-0002FC-Ur Subject: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 02:59:46 -0000 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My draft is as follows. Gregory Maxwell: Can you assign a BIP # for this? The next number, 38, is on the wiki as "Passphrase-protected private key" by Mike Caldwell, although it isn't in the list so I don't know if that is official or not. BIP: ? Title: NODE_BLOOM service bit Author: Peter Todd Type: Standards Track (draft) Created: 17-08-2013 Abstract =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This BIP extends BIP 37, Connection Bloom filtering, by defining a service = bit to allow peers to advertise that they support bloom filters explicitly. Motivation =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D BIP 37 did not specify a service bit for the bloom filter service, thus implicitly assuming that all nodes that serve peers data support it. There = are however cases where a node may want to provide data, such as mempool transactions and blocks, but do not want to or have not implemented bloom filtering. Additionally it is good practice for nodes to be given options a= s to the granularity of the services they are providing the public - a full-node operator may be able to donate only a small amount of bandwidth and may want those efforts to be used by other full-node operators. Specification =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The following protocol bit is added: NODE_BLOOM =3D (1 << 1) In addition the protocol version is increased from 70001 to 70002 in the reference implementation. Nodes that support bloom filters should set that protocol bit. Otherwise it should remain unset. NODE_BLOOM is distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but not NODE_NETWORK. If a node does not support bloom filters but receives a "filterload", "filteradd", or "filterclear" message from a peer the node should disconnect that peer immediately. While outside the scope of this BIP it is suggested that DNS seeds and other peer discovery mechanisms support the ability to specify the services requi= red; current implementations simply check only that NODE_NETWORK is set. Design rational =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D A service bit was chosen as applying a bloom filter is a service. The increase in protocol version is for backwards compatibility. Nodes that require the bloom filter service can set NODE_BLOOM for peers advertising a protocol version < 70002, allowing the rest of the implementation to be unchanged. Nodes with implementations that do not know of the NODE_BLOOM bit will be disconnected immediately as though the connection failed for some reason, and thus will not have incoming bandwidth wasted by that peer and c= an easily connect to another peer. Supporting NODE_BLOOM but not NODE_NETWORK allows for situations where a no= de may have data that its peers may be interested in, but is not a full node a= nd thus does not have block data in general. For instance an SPV node that receives a full, unfiltered, block from a peer may want to let its SPV peers know about the existence of that block and provide them that data if reques= ted. Those peers in turn may only be interested in knowing about the block if it matches a specific bloom filter. Note how in this example DoS attacks are m= ade prohibitively expensive by the work required to create a valid block header. Reference Implementation =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2900 Copyright =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This document is placed in the public domain. --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSEDiTAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7p3oH/06xdaPql9I5UYs+VF5swRvj CJU9X5/SwxbYU12knbzmsYza9TS6eXHx2KhJqNg5zRK/HyJqfhyo+8USQxDI5hJg y2nb0VicKw0j9mMl0Tuby8uH10C+VXaANtxfT/Hs9IAO5i97+W/CcFMis1FZnyWw POYbgyfJTr8t3mr9n+jGb72QLEYz1yK/7HwVhmrLZkeC2oG0Gsm8DKhvxukxjhht PoKF6tsNlwbfHx+5EeWv1046mJi2qXZSoMvEjwNhTMM5m3/u8tAUaPYEHD777ER+ BeRagbsToGVAdQpCzvaUoc7EiAmTDXK64KgShu7jPg4J+UUUHgpVghYreoF+JXg= =jqH2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--