Return-Path: <fresheneesz@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800E1C0033
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 19 Feb 2022 22:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671824010C
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 19 Feb 2022 22:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id GipkQVqXQi2q
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 19 Feb 2022 22:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B7F400B9
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 19 Feb 2022 22:00:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id bq11so366017edb.2
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:00:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=blWWOr89XNf7Q4p7KMHgm9mJZZVfa+4uh0+sG5zs5K0=;
 b=k7QIpEQI3UzWpxQ0ppVhSo6j8CMGMpypQNCuunViInHUNwr1KFjXGATlDNrw49oJVq
 w7SRiu23djH9pVs2zcsmkij1bFCzPtjhwnXFshHJs7ZKm5fFtbqG7SerpN53wnHHDKwd
 KCqLEJf6ZhyQXOTXlx8HIeW8U1tTn4WjbFPEI1qMa3k19AR51U1gchRZpskdZ4y8PlLH
 U2sy8UMHXQgS6rAVn4X11jQEUZddavOnKHY1sH1JMqzk8wGXJ9bNoIfLeM4EzJku2HOy
 r3XqJ+9l3IatlEqQWHQEoyTI+vCCjRJfiGeKvwU9ZX+gkuKgqkcyVV/EQqD2/EXbMvBV
 +GbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=blWWOr89XNf7Q4p7KMHgm9mJZZVfa+4uh0+sG5zs5K0=;
 b=C5tJ7wao1D9F9pItpZe4iPG8NH+aFP2zevAVTmqN/9uJzHcrCtBYBLlmX5iCTFM78/
 jrXBQ3PySfDewwIQUOXMOCoU+P9FmKFrrrQT0Rw1oUjTh3Tr/ca7CtlwjnRyyz7g0bpH
 vIJrWILKCdgkexVBYFvDm/5e6T8IGVILC7L54k9jnDCEPktKnJ9KqH5pfDKMr1V/A86V
 aU6i8kmhu2GUpR77ad9j/HekjVjXlIfwUhcqptt5Ay7dJv6TWaTO28pgA7AdY4xx+1ad
 RkTLu90w+j4lq8QOxUx28dEn1JfTUtL32FxSGrPZVcNFE4Ws6nlJr19q/1916qKPQ38H
 7Dkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532YxG3BwfwbGDBKO6u3dMJ0WuVgmNr641CcXzI7AQVhOfsJwnn9
 9Q0HfjtzTZzkXCmSirtq5Luv31KKmV10yk8G024=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzl8NklvjPkbfOKLl5Quj0G5vm0EL1Nr/MGQ/f82J+owmjY4Msjc24QOcQ25eKED3nn/5G+yd1gilKYW7hlvg0=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:8a89:0:b0:410:c862:40b2 with SMTP id
 j9-20020a508a89000000b00410c86240b2mr14265452edj.81.1645307999192; Sat, 19
 Feb 2022 13:59:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6nZ-SkxvJLrOCOIdUtLOsdnl94DoX_NHY0uwZ7sw78t24FQ33QJlJU95W7Sk1ja5EFic5a3yql14MLmSAYFZvLGBS4lDUJfr8ut9hdB7GD4=@protonmail.com>
 <CALZpt+Ee9kuVjpXYgOb_7dB7Yr8HYmicdRhfgXsQkey2szNDHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <0mhhHzTun8dpIcLda1CLFihMsgLoWQUEE8woKUKhf_UHYps2w7jVzbJAUJ302kQEB1ZdvMfakP9IBUHLM8bGns-pg0NHmpuak3yjpphjJnw=@protonmail.com>
 <CAD5xwhh9JHE0QAfRMeKs7w=L-GB5DaEomsQ0aH4ibSDi9Oe8Rg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB3F3Dt6znirMfe4C6ASh6OvS_qR7XLx1fQ4O5ZCwbxhcNKsNg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGpPWDYUJ66oA2gzjXYk2fvRaRMZeY4wCyS0KmimXtid03ahCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <gcBcBwsL0ocO4fpTF1ZNkFTWGNhuPCHpbwjV5pzO4I2IR9WOfEEsQqL_i2IMqV2k8eDj9POJlQ0IX7eIzovjYq7gV6E6LTOjmAlINIIbxQM=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <gcBcBwsL0ocO4fpTF1ZNkFTWGNhuPCHpbwjV5pzO4I2IR9WOfEEsQqL_i2IMqV2k8eDj9POJlQ0IX7eIzovjYq7gV6E6LTOjmAlINIIbxQM=@protonmail.com>
From: Billy Tetrud <billy.tetrud@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 15:59:41 -0600
Message-ID: <CAGpPWDY6X3X4ne0AatGaVx9tZSsi9V4hTAVfef-Hqe1kH0SXHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d68adb05d8661e87"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 23:06:00 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
 Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] `OP_EVICT`: An Alternative to
	`OP_TAPLEAFUPDATEVERIFY`
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 22:00:02 -0000

--000000000000d68adb05d8661e87
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Thanks for the clarification ZmnSCPxj!

On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 5:41 AM ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com> wrote:

> Good morning Billy,
>
> > > "fully" punitive channels also make large value channels more
> dangerous from the perspective of bugs causing old states to be published
> >
> > Wouldn't it be ideal to have the penalty be to pay for a single extra
> transaction fee? That way there is a penalty so cheating attempts aren't
> free (for someone who wants to close a channel anyway) and yet a single fee
> isn't going to be much of a concern in the accidental publishing case. It
> still perplexes me why eltoo chose no penalty at all vs a small penalty
> like that.
>
> Nothing in the Decker-Russell-Osunstokun paper *prevents* that --- you
> could continue to retain per-participant versions of update+state
> transactions (congruent to the per-participant commitment transactions of
> Poon-Dryja) and have each participant hold a version that deducts the fee
> from their main owned funds.
> The Decker-Russell-Osuntokun paper simply focuses on the mechanism by
> itself without regard to fees, on the understanding that the reader already
> knows fees exist and need to be paid.
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
>

--000000000000d68adb05d8661e87
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Thanks for the clarification ZmnSCPxj!=C2=A0</div><br><div=
 class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, Feb 19=
, 2022 at 5:41 AM ZmnSCPxj &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com">Z=
mnSCPxj@protonmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_q=
uote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,2=
04);padding-left:1ex">Good morning Billy,<br>
<br>
&gt; &gt;=C2=A0&quot;fully&quot; punitive channels also make large value ch=
annels more dangerous from the perspective of bugs causing old=C2=A0states =
to be published<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Wouldn&#39;t it be ideal to have the penalty be to pay for a single ex=
tra transaction fee? That way there is a penalty so cheating attempts aren&=
#39;t free (for someone who wants to close a channel anyway) and yet a sing=
le fee isn&#39;t going to be much of a concern in the accidental publishing=
 case. It still perplexes me why eltoo chose no penalty at all vs a small p=
enalty like that.<br>
<br>
Nothing in the Decker-Russell-Osunstokun paper *prevents* that --- you coul=
d continue to retain per-participant versions of update+state transactions =
(congruent to the per-participant commitment transactions of Poon-Dryja) an=
d have each participant hold a version that deducts the fee from their main=
 owned funds.<br>
The Decker-Russell-Osuntokun paper simply focuses on the mechanism by itsel=
f without regard to fees, on the understanding that the reader already know=
s fees exist and need to be paid.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
ZmnSCPxj<br>
</blockquote></div>

--000000000000d68adb05d8661e87--