Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Qcyhg-0001Yc-7E for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:49:40 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.218.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.218.47; envelope-from=witchspace81@gmail.com; helo=mail-yi0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-yi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Qcyhf-00014y-FX for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:49:40 +0000 Received: by yib18 with SMTP id 18so2073388yib.34 for ; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 04:49:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.118.19 with SMTP id v19mr3669154ybm.300.1309607373914; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 04:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.150.15 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:49:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1309606214.2285.54.camel@Desktop666> References: <1309606214.2285.54.camel@Desktop666> Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:49:33 +0000 Message-ID: From: John Smith To: Matt Corallo Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001e680f157c5141c304a714ba76 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (witchspace81[at]gmail.com) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Qcyhf-00014y-FX Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:49:40 -0000 --001e680f157c5141c304a714ba76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Matt Corallo wrote: > would be up to whoever writes the build system. However, autotools is > more standard than CMake, and since its a shell script, you dont have to > install CMake which doesnt come standard on almost any distros (AFAIK). > CMake is also very standard, used by many projects, and is available in many distros. For debians it's as simple as apt-get install cmake, which is not a big problem as you need to install the other dependencies (such as boost) as well to build. Fedora/redhat also seems to have the package 'cmake'. I don't think there is any modern distro that doesn't have it as a package. JS --001e680f157c5141c304a714ba76 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Matt Corall= o <bitcoin= -list@bluematt.me> wrote:
would be up to whoever writes the build system. However, autotools is
more standard than CMake, and since its a shell script, you dont have to install CMake which doesnt come standard on almost any distros (AFAIK).
=

CMake is also very standard, used by many projects, a= nd is available in many distros.

For debians it's as simple as a= pt-get install cmake, which is not a big problem as you need to install the= other dependencies (such as boost) as well to build.

Fedora/redhat also seems to have the package 'cmake'. I don'= ;t think there is any modern distro that doesn't have it as a package.<= br>
JS

--001e680f157c5141c304a714ba76--