Return-Path: <bitcoin@upalc.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 230F21032
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:49:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com
	[209.85.213.169])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA361CD
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:49:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igcpb10 with SMTP id pb10so18244842igc.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=3JlCaBKVvycKGX2dpX2ElgFPB4wQUb4gEcqWAfZ/BU4=;
	b=N27j6Dz8JXyuI8FNOaLaJ/Oag152P1+sQa1tIxXFc4ycBgvr2SFAQjV0Oi1K+glTZA
	gMSh0ibVWTFav+kChIp6FUcUNWxdFbPvTFWfQTQ38eySHWUiPI19iV1+71a4NyB1zNg1
	CvYbdZiSwvS46euwuhNipz+EQlwy62Ge20COM1RdObKXJvgCicEl3hYJNlQ9YiLxoMta
	PxgCGKl9FUAOIvZPTu5HeJ+EvObvqMHe0oZVBSSupPRQFb3jFIXyTnDd5fBKKQdvAsed
	/lMIqDMN1HbxO4EA5Nn6cn5Iqe236GZt+ZBsGTYTO3csqi752gSgGcrZa1DB2rX7Amlj
	0Jag==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkPiuxU8TuJZHmcCh2jJbla9K0r8Mj5wgZro1+v+PF7HOjdr6Ph65D7Jst1PevcTwh3rRcz
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.117.9 with SMTP id ka9mr28150070igb.8.1442512187971; Thu,
	17 Sep 2015 10:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.57.213 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [115.187.39.116]
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 23:19:47 +0530
Message-ID: <CAED3CWjwOszaFQart02hVRvbmC4L_+J7CDz5cx6-8aaLZ5hgWg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Upal Chakraborty <bitcoin@upalc.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011617108cb06b051ff50aff
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 106 : Graphs Required
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:49:49 -0000

--089e011617108cb06b051ff50aff
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hello,

First of all, I'm not sure if it is the right place to ask for such help.
But, I thought, someone might just help out.

I'm looking for two graphs to analyze the effectiveness of BIP 106, which
can be found at
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0106.mediawiki.
Blockchain.info currently provides a graph plotting the historical data of
block size for each block, which can be found at...

https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=

I need two similar graphs plotting max block size cap against each block,
calculated as per my two proposals in BIP 106. Is it possible for anyone to
provide these two graphs assuming max block size cap for block 1 was 1mb ?

Thanks & Regards,
Upal Chakraborty

--089e011617108cb06b051ff50aff
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hello,</div><div><br></div><div>First of all, I&#39;m=
 not sure if it is the right place to ask for such help. But, I thought, so=
meone might just help out.</div><div><br></div><div>I&#39;m looking for two=
 graphs to analyze the effectiveness of BIP 106, which can be found at=C2=
=A0<a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0106.mediawik=
i">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0106.mediawiki</a>. Bloc=
kchain.info currently provides a graph plotting the historical data of bloc=
k size for each block, which can be found at...</div><div><br></div><div><a=
 href=3D"https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=3Dall&amp;s=
howDataPoints=3Dfalse&amp;daysAverageString=3D1&amp;show_header=3Dtrue&amp;=
scale=3D0&amp;address=3D">https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?tim=
espan=3Dall&amp;showDataPoints=3Dfalse&amp;daysAverageString=3D1&amp;show_h=
eader=3Dtrue&amp;scale=3D0&amp;address=3D</a></div><div><br></div><div>I ne=
ed two similar graphs plotting max block size cap against each block, calcu=
lated as per my two proposals in BIP 106. Is it possible for anyone to prov=
ide these two graphs assuming max block size cap for block 1 was 1mb ?</div=
><br><div><div style=3D"color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8px">Thanks &amp; R=
egards,</div><div style=3D"color:rgb(80,0,80);font-size:12.8px">Upal Chakra=
borty</div></div></div>

--089e011617108cb06b051ff50aff--