Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WPCDe-0002CY-M7 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:39:19 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.48; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f48.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WPCDd-0000Zu-Us for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:39:18 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id gf5so2949306lab.21 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:39:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.170.234 with SMTP id ap10mr12564198lbc.23.1394980751464; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.184.226 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:39:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5325B5BC.3030501@gmx.de> References: <5325A61B.6050802@gmx.de> <5325B5BC.3030501@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:39:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Thomas Voegtlin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WPCDd-0000Zu-Us Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Electrum 1.9.8 release X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:39:19 -0000 On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Thomas Voegtlin wrote: > thanks for your feedback! > > I was not aware that that implementation was flawed. > I will see how I can fix that code and get back to you. It also leaks on the order of 7 bits of data about the message per message chunk. I'm also think it's likely that there are some messages which are just incorrectly decrypted. ... it's really screwy and suspect.