Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RNR7O-0006b3-Kx for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:28:14 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RNR7N-0007Ld-SS for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:28:14 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7C49D9004B; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:28:06 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:27:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20111107150240.GA26096@ulyssis.org> In-Reply-To: <20111107150240.GA26096@ulyssis.org> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111071027.58932.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RNR7N-0007Ld-SS Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Difficulty adjustment / time issues X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:28:14 -0000 On Monday, November 07, 2011 10:02:43 AM Pieter Wuille wrote: > Maybe a short interval (1 minute? 10 minutes?) instead of a fixed > value could be allowed for the multiple-of-2016 blocks. Reminder that there is *already* a short interval only allowed for blocks in general...