Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:05:48 +0000
From: Alice Larson <alicelarson@ruggedinbox.com>
To: milly@bitcoins.info
Message-ID: <2bad149d24c6659b924e27c500619c60@ruggedinbox.com>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks
Precedence: list

> You are correct.  It is also counterproductive to take cheap shots at
> vendors in order to garner consulting revenue.  Measuring risk in a
> systematic way against known metrics is the way to go.  Tweeting,
> blogging, and drama are generally counterproductive.
> 
> When the issue is raised most of the developers shun the idea so until
> some of the developers become mature and experienced you will be left
> with all this teenager nonsense where everybody calls each other
> "trolls" on Reddit instead of engaging in real risk analysis.

The twitter teenage nonsense from Todd is ridiculous: 
https://twitter.com/playatodd (warning, triggering)

Mike Hearn has mentioned a few times how Todd's habit of creating drama 
on twitter and reddit every time anyone wants to change something in 
Bitcoin in a way he doesn't like is driving away vendors. Openly 
commenting on a female developers cleavage on twitter, as well as 
referring to a female journalist as "naughty" is disgusting. Him 
constantly hitting on women developers in Bitcoin is driving away 
females.