Return-Path: <alicelarson@ruggedinbox.com> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39471488 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:15:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:09:22 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from ruggedinbox.com (ruggedinbox.com [94.156.77.238]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C160A1AB for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:05:48 +0000 From: Alice Larson <alicelarson@ruggedinbox.com> To: milly@bitcoins.info Message-ID: <2bad149d24c6659b924e27c500619c60@ruggedinbox.com> X-Sender: alicelarson@ruggedinbox.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core and hard forks X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:15:17 -0000 > You are correct. It is also counterproductive to take cheap shots at > vendors in order to garner consulting revenue. Measuring risk in a > systematic way against known metrics is the way to go. Tweeting, > blogging, and drama are generally counterproductive. > > When the issue is raised most of the developers shun the idea so until > some of the developers become mature and experienced you will be left > with all this teenager nonsense where everybody calls each other > "trolls" on Reddit instead of engaging in real risk analysis. The twitter teenage nonsense from Todd is ridiculous: https://twitter.com/playatodd (warning, triggering) Mike Hearn has mentioned a few times how Todd's habit of creating drama on twitter and reddit every time anyone wants to change something in Bitcoin in a way he doesn't like is driving away vendors. Openly commenting on a female developers cleavage on twitter, as well as referring to a female journalist as "naughty" is disgusting. Him constantly hitting on women developers in Bitcoin is driving away females.