Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RDGaP-0006qd-Sz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:12:09 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RDGaL-0002ic-SW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:12:09 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60AAA20409B; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:12:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: Mike Hearn Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:11:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201110100905.58725.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201110101011.50597.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1RDGaL-0002ic-SW Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Help wanted: translations X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:12:10 -0000 On Monday, October 10, 2011 9:18:07 AM Mike Hearn wrote: > > > > As I will no longer be using bitcoind for Eligius soon > > > > > > What will you be using instead? Isn't bitcoind a requirement for > > > running > > > > a > > > > > pool? > > > > Writing some custom software designed to more efficiently create work. > > To clarify, bitcoind will still serve the purpose of peering with > > external nodes and picking out valid transactions to be accepted into > > blocks; it just > > won't be involved in the primary operations of the pool. > > Ah, I see. Sounds a bit like the direction Steve is going with poolserverj. > So your custom software would handle incrementing the extraNonce, > recalculating the merkle tree/root, and so on? Yes, does that already. Hard part right now is implementing a stateless TCP/IP "stack" so it can ignore DDoS sanely.