Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VajBI-0006gj-I7 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:32:16 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.44; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-la0-f44.google.com; Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1VajBH-0002NQ-Ih for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:32:16 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id ep20so5017905lab.31 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.126.37 with SMTP id mv5mr10721603lbb.20.1382952728840; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.89.72 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <274a1888-276c-4aa6-a818-68f548fbe0fa@me.com> <9DCDB8F6-E3B2-426B-A41E-087E66B3821A@gmail.com> <526B45DB.2030200@jerviss.org> <526DD18A.7060201@jerviss.org> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 02:32:08 -0700 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Andreas Schildbach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: schildbach.de] X-Headers-End: 1VajBH-0002NQ-Ih Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Feedback requested: "reject" p2p message X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:32:16 -0000 On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > HTTP also defines success codes (2xx). Are we also talking about ACK > messages now, rather than just REJECT messages? I do not believe we should do that: It would be a non-trivial increase the protocol bandwidth requirements.