Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
	designates 74.125.82.177 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.177; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
	helo=mail-we0-f177.google.com; 
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJna-HhhqYGSVwapvR_5yvRY3gc6wXGaNXm_dkP4Tid7F1SsLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHLa0PWF38N0-CFY9b3FzFdN2NfLduWHCeCQHXQOKirDYn0Pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJna-HhhqYGSVwapvR_5yvRY3gc6wXGaNXm_dkP4Tid7F1SsLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:39:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0NVZOKCPMqRaGZyVnp0=0H0=AacRzKd_kaX1rVKH_pVFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: slush <slush@centrum.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Decentralizing ming
Precedence: list

Before they got traction, yes.  But he projected a bit, as anyone
could, to see the trend.

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:22 PM, slush <slush@centrum.cz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:
>>
>> Historical note:  On one hand, Satoshi seemed to dislike the early
>> emergence of GPU mining pools quite a bit.
>
>
> To my knowledge, Satoshi left the project before mining pools got a
> traction.
>
> slush


-- 
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/