Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WI026-0002as-FM for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:13:38 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WI024-0001s0-TJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:13:38 +0000 Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.0.101]); authenticated by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1WI01y-0002nK-An; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:13:30 +0100 From: Tamas Blummer Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A11A70DA-5FB7-4E7F-A87D-9B8DF649B477"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <449F9E79-7B1B-4821-93C3-F1DC1B5B1DEA@bitsofproof.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:13:29 +0100 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1393265616; 52e7ead9; X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1WI024-0001s0-TJ Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:13:38 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A11A70DA-5FB7-4E7F-A87D-9B8DF649B477 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_262AF7DA-4C49-4E4A-94EF-DA700E5119A2" --Apple-Mail=_262AF7DA-4C49-4E4A-94EF-DA700E5119A2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii It costs at least 5430 satoshis to create an output at the moment. Is the same spam limit applied if the script is OP_RETURN? If not, I would be concerned od opening a cheap spam. Tamas Blummer On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Wladimir wrote: > > And if this is not abused, these kind of transactions become popular, and > more space is really needed, the limit can always be increased in a future > version. > > Wladimir > --Apple-Mail=_262AF7DA-4C49-4E4A-94EF-DA700E5119A2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

It costs at least 5430 satoshis to create an output at the moment.

Is the same spam limit applied if the script is OP_RETURN?

If not, I would be concerned od opening a cheap spam.

Tamas Blummer

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com> wrote:

And if this is not abused, these kind of transactions become popular, and
more space is really needed, the limit can always be increased in a future
version.

Wladimir

--Apple-Mail=_262AF7DA-4C49-4E4A-94EF-DA700E5119A2-- --Apple-Mail=_A11A70DA-5FB7-4E7F-A87D-9B8DF649B477 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTC4vJAAoJEPZykcUXcTkcd/0IAIWfRpiOA8kZycFgy3Etm8w0 YYqEOvlgZkrzZTsR+zPo8i2YCrllfu+v1/fl47FwiwWYqCDavsqnT91DMe0I1VAa Ed9egEj3QHISMymJt+epo2BQkxIojBpDD3XhL8kntop/5b7RPZMOPhnBiWL5vpkw 6isZrdr6iJdjuDQU75/336FVRhGNGRX8u2qspXdWqJASaCFwBL5XnDXn7fyQwpiw dp/OZafiWkU2T2SVgXFJqO2ROWOCfIdK6sMEaz5LTfO5tQthPZT/cyTrM6+vZ706 VYXQFZhlsTbgIGErYgwKe0Sur2ZYaygInyc1zARrywFuO73Y2Ni4ZnwVHDta7zk= =g7mc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_A11A70DA-5FB7-4E7F-A87D-9B8DF649B477--