Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SIM97-0003Vo-EF for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:41:17 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1SIM91-0001NA-Vu for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:41:17 +0000 Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so1945048wgb.10 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:41:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.88.169 with SMTP id bh9mr7147918wib.5.1334245265872; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.88.208 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:41:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:41:05 -0400 Message-ID: From: Gavin Andresen To: sirk390@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1SIM91-0001NA-Vu Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Adding request/reply id in messages X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:41:17 -0000 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Christian Bodt wrote: > I would like to discuss the following bitcoin protocol improvement propos= al: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Adding request/reply id in all messages (in the messag= e header, > based on what was done for the "checksum" field) That seems like a perfectly reasonable protocol improvement to me. Anybody else have an opinion? --=20 -- Gavin Andresen