Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YOUvZ-0000c5-VM for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:30:17 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.172; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-we0-f172.google.com; Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YOUvY-0003hp-Jy for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:30:17 +0000 Received: by wesk11 with SMTP id k11so1068674wes.11 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:30:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.121.168 with SMTP id ll8mr10671829wjb.35.1424367010858; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:30:10 -0800 (PST) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.188.11 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:30:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54DE7601.4070509@voskuil.org> <54DF07A5.1060004@voskuil.org> <54DF2E80.5060506@voskuil.org> <20150214131320.GA26731@savin.petertodd.org> <3D4F2E23-CADE-4FE7-B960-3F79815E868C@bitsofproof.com> <20150215170228.GB21269@savin.petertodd.org> <20150219033205.GS14804@nl.grid.coop> <065C5F2E-FC1D-4994-A39A-9125D663FC71@petertodd.org> <5944A0DB-DFE9-4D30-9049-AD38F37E3756@bitsofproof.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:30:10 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Di9xehYCJzwzeF_c4mF3PDfJDn0 Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01227e9eb64aec050f744972 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YOUvY-0003hp-Jy Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:30:18 -0000 --089e01227e9eb64aec050f744972 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > He didn't said "a project for all possible language bindings", just > java bindings. Other languages' bindings would be separate projects. Yes/no/sorta. Java/JNA bindings can be used from Python, Ruby, Javascript, PHP as well as dialects of Haskell, Lisp, Smalltalk and a bunch of more obscure languages like Scala, Kotlin, Ceylon, etc. It makes more sense to talk about bindings to particular runtimes these days, rather than particular languages. --089e01227e9eb64aec050f744972 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
He didn't said "a project for all possi= ble language bindings", just
java bindings. Other languages' bindings would be separate projects.

Yes/no/sorta.

Java/J= NA bindings can be used from Python, Ruby, Javascript, PHP as well as diale= cts of Haskell, Lisp, Smalltalk and a bunch of more obscure languages like = Scala, Kotlin, Ceylon, etc.

It makes more sense to= talk about bindings to particular runtimes these days, rather than particu= lar languages.
--089e01227e9eb64aec050f744972--