Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBC2AB6E for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 00:04:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from homiemail-a38.g.dreamhost.com (homie.mail.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.208]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2D6EB for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 00:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a38.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a38.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DA710AFB5; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:04:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=taoeffect.com; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; s=taoeffect.com; bh=Z0nTP5UynwDXaDFbE MndZrWtUaY=; b=vy7PR+N7sF7qYjbt63i8ZiguB4LC7wfNYJYjQSUoYENjtOhio DmiRhch0Pvgz7GzGzkJc/XIo0H2F2b65SmzyE5z0qxbzjLpjLEh+psPnq6KtXVeY m9InFUyUZi5GwAPqm9OffrerEOA7xZsSZJqKxzOMdoG7VTxGHPfv0OEq64= Received: from [192.168.42.64] (184-23-255-227.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net [184.23.255.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: contact@taoeffect.com) by homiemail-a38.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C37510AFB0; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8873578A-63CE-4DFC-9517-A2C5C707A1D2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Tao Effect In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:04:29 -0700 X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 518486669.411256-911b9b3cfcc932781873488b18192e58 Message-Id: <78F1D626-0D38-48FD-B2AF-378765182751@taoeffect.com> References: <31833011-7179-49D1-A07E-8FD9556C4534@taoeffect.com> <20170606232015.GA11830@erisian.com.au> <38DDC3A2-2727-477E-A6FF-7638842AAB03@taoeffect.com> To: Kekcoin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:07:18 +0000 Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Anthony Towns Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Replay attacks make BIP148 and BIP149 untennable X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:04:33 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_8873578A-63CE-4DFC-9517-A2C5C707A1D2 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_478A5B32-6D74-4181-9F21-E0D07BA474A1" --Apple-Mail=_478A5B32-6D74-4181-9F21-E0D07BA474A1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > You keep referring to 148 coinbase coins, what is the rationale behind = this? Why would you prefer using 148 coinbases over legacy coinbases for = this purpose? OK, maybe "post-UASF coinbase coins" is a better term? I just wanted to = make it clear that this refers to coins that come from blocks generated = after the UASF is activated. -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also = sharing with the NSA. > On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Kekcoin > wrote: >=20 > You keep referring to 148 coinbase coins, what is the rationale behind = this? Why would you prefer using 148 coinbases over legacy coinbases for = this purpose? >=20 >=20 > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. --Apple-Mail=_478A5B32-6D74-4181-9F21-E0D07BA474A1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
You keep = referring to 148 coinbase coins, what is the rationale behind this? Why = would you prefer using 148 coinbases over legacy coinbases for this = purpose?

OK, = maybe "post-UASF coinbase coins" is a better term? I just wanted to make = it clear that this refers to coins that come from blocks generated after = the UASF is activated.

--
Please do not email me anything that you are not = comfortable also sharing with the NSA.

On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Kekcoin <kekcoin@protonmail.com> wrote:

You = keep referring to 148 coinbase coins, what is the rationale behind this? = Why would you prefer using 148 coinbases over legacy coinbases for this = purpose?


Sent with ProtonMail Secure = Email.

= --Apple-Mail=_478A5B32-6D74-4181-9F21-E0D07BA474A1-- --Apple-Mail=_8873578A-63CE-4DFC-9517-A2C5C707A1D2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJZN0MNAAoJEOxnICvpCVJHqM4QAJxkVzXlZsKntncjIm9197iJ M/tpuBGx9JOQpzcf9j2xwdFAfEAeOqfpkK8jlrodiqDW446S8TOFmfhoWmWrNiZE DQIsGF4aHIylpv9BlPdo3JTA2gFi9Q+OP0MTc16TwG5+cTeH0ldQcaRXzsTrTELi VT3y2FRd+wDMwb3rWPzVBwbTe0tnkSUb5J3cd/3z+62BbGusRtsxYoru7aveKSpE mGCQG9n9aBO0xcP0/9+qV9t+V4QwpRiCQTfBY9uKjyqkP5Fmen0QzyFNluqv8SDq Lgyhf+RIgnx2yThReLjhvi4101Jh8fmICkHltVLjIp7zJCuMrz5OfzRPaNsSkv8S tKPf24Res8r6vYJCwiTnsRB/YA0PDSS7heJ4lvpaz+cZdDzG4yTellfLcyHNdSUX da9xaN8xk2oPJjEIlRgbS8xiOAzIKJbkZBFVrY7Hb/G+SBLrN8n5cMxCfAdsFR3e eivqUsF2fUzqpN/AdCRvogjqvNxQ0j8DM/2enxF3nBMUmeMiC9z2sMr1qkMFgIK4 LhYamXCLW+LnB9Bt4ZJGnYeFUizUyry4YrC/geW1RQwxmKPgd4XBx7/GWMAdUhtE 1bsuWmQP0k+9OSAKtXJ9nJOEabe8iAtk68fClBbZKgIggqfqiOWMazb2RyRiZE+w AcJiR7Y7mfRfXqJxSxmw =brYZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_8873578A-63CE-4DFC-9517-A2C5C707A1D2--