Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B03849B9 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:16:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com (mail-pf0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65012176 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id e4so84659819pfg.1 for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:16:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thinlink-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8Ks1qv8+3Yx4Yi3vsFZAlmM9KEak5zPdi7UJ16LGUZc=; b=1uZp0rdD8CjR2gtUDYV96BssbNnU/fM/gasHVwrOVqL/e99OgQfqA1n3zerCONklk0 WPmJgPDaRgord4UoXwUDt61wIy+WZZ3Ysx24TyyFB4KTRJXH9YJUE+FeBoakM28ME1AQ oyeDdrsx7yIARHAztCEv47bjualkn4gPU2nf2go6ZnjEwjSO6zlsXoapGkwmoeiyKDhA MMZyMxBDSMuhD/ZNAQeyk0HLRaDCt/rx3v4WAW3i4LQbwwjMpaoKPU6ehRgYPQ7b4dRN DknVNn0QDVwMxW8o9JqlRj2zJx87YI/NNXBSLBclx4JysdPB/JZ4OqPGzkMs+G7xP2is Mg0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8Ks1qv8+3Yx4Yi3vsFZAlmM9KEak5zPdi7UJ16LGUZc=; b=aY8FPC68tRFj8x62KIKnt2NXTX7unX7Hh4kFqbVQPdSlai7cBrjF68vkGNh9dWfrel atEwiIacX0zpXa+zWRGgOYPGVdiqvd+9AeQBI+Smef8jgCIId+1CLZ7dDAirhqIOcf7H aSZU4d3Z4P9KWWBNBWYgYbJ5Ip4P/Yg3EVMADbiO0n48D7NbjXvbW2SPflmRMZAXpoWg 49YaSzRjGr76qS67eqbOF4xyw+SUAYguUDTBUfIhj2I9kL2x1M0ZdSdaqCIcOpMRQGRp /PFAIqRs+YHC8XjP2HUxNans4K+IjlW4MWXuhosf6NgXf0RhoEIe/Xaga9fFPxDzByGV Q4Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIWMsqWjbCtNwZgUrL0RVmY+DmEZcVzbfPhvnoyipDK6O7CY3zWUAAnfiSWiDMEhC/b X-Received: by 10.99.160.84 with SMTP id u20mr20022317pgn.141.1485717414382; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:16:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net. [99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm26434187pga.34.2017.01.29.11.16.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:16:52 -0800 (PST) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <201701270107.01092.luke@dashjr.org> <20170127212810.GA5856@nex> <201701280403.05558.luke@dashjr.org> From: Tom Harding Message-ID: <583ef2d2-8315-da9f-7815-768cb4ccb515@thinlink.com> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:15:38 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:28:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three hardfork-related BIPs X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:16:55 -0000 On 1/28/2017 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: > a world of nodes in large datacenters is a world where it's very easy > to force the few Bitcoin nodes remaining to follow AML/KYC rules If that's true, why haven't we already seen AML/KYC required of mining pools? That would be comparatively trivial.