Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C6AD23 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:38:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com (mail-qg0-f51.google.com [209.85.192.51]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01CE168 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e32so83872676qgf.3 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:38:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3Ed8HY+ZTcknOPgqmb34uVNr29Y1Whxgaa6RVu3WpUc=; b=T43AesVXrGuF4TQuSzLhHwC5uJndf15YmKY8Ub185ORLeWVj/wGLEt7V6s2z2NTRTN IZSK+iun7leQgrKf5M6uizFi3SHes7gbZPwBy4xu16DEak2QD7a8V+J1Xc5c5L7mqE+4 AcKQudC+mrt4HH/LfcLXMW8LyQl43ZNK3nRyCDWAvkpEVDp1sGJYLQ/nxjwqQ++05jvh fpnzXKtx+x3SYST7sCp5b64IdhtNqaEjUdX7aM+e6R6TL1V86SJsQC69/zvbnD0BZjzO aZuBL78wKKoHxZ+WVEiCLZnGxix4joouvyAeTxkepdMT/Ayd0fted+a2fNE4X3yfoKQq sUxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=3Ed8HY+ZTcknOPgqmb34uVNr29Y1Whxgaa6RVu3WpUc=; b=R0kCQAbqmfK8ApadmCR80ClmgWyphRMibxv4HI3t4d6MhefQ4n+mG33kNCRwjtH+EX Qpe30eBmEhXpk6RVFx1GYPmgmuSplnobdGxXxLwsLsmJysheg3wdz3M7skbP1/S0YPbM VifSFBwiTCgdkuI4MarN66QmEJOcVLWZdfpDqW1HhWQU6ZwFJ5YJSiiO7ZG0VpgpUj3O kRUN1gGSbn4nESDgDO7Tn7guYr/YJPtn639kCFWuwrNh130Y8E7y5p278cUZycRzcNeR ++754DsvIJWMZcYLUJiu2+xJEAGRddknZx1spGCPVneA7n36jTukHqZlYwj+FhHxkHWm mAow== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR69+2mtYkucM1+dX0NhWFWlASopPPFrR7Bh6wUm+PezcDk3B3pBD+szVDZKk7cXg== X-Received: by 10.140.102.11 with SMTP id v11mr12697445qge.39.1453585126158; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:38:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.40] (c-24-91-28-148.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.28.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c190sm5672222qkb.27.2016.01.23.13.38.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:38:45 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Gavin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13C75) In-Reply-To: <20160123205953.GA22494@muck> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:38:44 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3B18134A-3E3A-4A98-ADD3-9F5E8600047E@gmail.com> References: <87si1rycux.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <2998879.R5sQRbxZRv@1337h4x0r> <87powvy20w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1736759.DT0dcscznj@1337h4x0r> <20160123205953.GA22494@muck> To: Peter Todd X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:23:09 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three Month bitcoin-dev Moderation Review X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:38:47 -0000 > On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote: >=20 > I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should > contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation > the last +1 gave isn't useful. Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either technical dis= cussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the following should b= e encouraged: "+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that would= have been prevented if XYZ. Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com"