Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2F9C000D for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 22:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262F0401EA for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 22:59:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.864 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.864 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=willtech.com.au Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z64e9_-7Up9j for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 22:59:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:20:46 by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from out2-50.antispamcloud.com (out2-50.antispamcloud.com [185.201.17.50]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5AF5401A6 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 22:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s110.servername.online ([204.44.192.22]) by mx134.antispamcloud.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mcEnL-000AMq-WA; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:38:24 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=willtech.com.au; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:MIME-Version:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JMJcQ2Zxxm98lPXSRgTGqxQsR5nAcIqgfyl+UWj8Nkw=; b=mYRTx02K64ulntFYWNT8qHczsU DxpTL7+8lo92Z3H9cpNt/HWRsRs/aQEOrywHoNIrX5+/DEYB6Jlfb3WPH/aPdnyqaU4K14zjrZaTA eZ/qW26xJueqMilcNhKm/unfGlmdOiHPyGpkbO7nyBgv1OBSpxSjhElBQPVBBr5X6RSNxH2FVumHu +BR2dBJBjz8WG4boigiIfcd1j68CGXKueWXie6Q6jxMtm3/zoN3R3d5djDjIgmJ907m7iBmRubpnE MVoUecwvBbsTdlZpP+XPgcMm/ApGelCUyBmnmG8n0IBW+EDPBRL0roiCL9FOBhRnxQMWxHIL3tVu5 1qiRL23A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36822 helo=s110.servername.online) by s110.servername.online with esmtpa (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mcEnI-00GEnD-L7; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 15:38:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 15:38:16 -0700 From: damian@willtech.com.au To: James Lu , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion In-Reply-To: References: <50769965-423dd279413d4dba11ba459cbd98387b@pmq6v.m5r2.onet> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11 Message-ID: <429a737551829fe6dcd4e427dc508fa5@willtech.com.au> X-Sender: damian@willtech.com.au Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: s110.servername.online: authenticated_id: damian@willtech.com.au X-Authenticated-Sender: s110.servername.online: damian@willtech.com.au X-AuthUser: damian@willtech.com.au X-Originating-IP: 204.44.192.22 X-Spampanel-Domain: outgoing-shared.hostpapa.com X-Spampanel-Username: outgoingshared Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=outgoingshared@outgoing-shared.hostpapa.com X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.14) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: Pt3MvcO5N4iKaDQ5O6lkdGlMVN6RH8bjRMzItlySaT/r+forY51UmQFmm0E4iN3YPUtbdvnXkggZ 3YnVId/Y5jcf0yeVQAvfjHznO7+bT5x89I6OBCEBlF7ypOkyh4zgrx0ZBshD5C7LlDO+eunO9rn/ tfvVbQ62B9wyq9PPKU/O0uIEo7i3q6zqFFNX+jBZA9AqycexfCpNwzqrEVSIrOpwF9RZSi89Cn73 owe96uE4GO1rDeROLkSnoyN/b9bQcciY2z4hq7SqXAJrAGow5AtjLai5KebCf5RYMVyUO1xXDbcg i9OY+sGIy7ENShc+3JC7ZZttIlCRckB14TRjKhJP0e5NHi2zHu6omVSkAwQGSMbV1tDM+Ae0jBe1 lPRwPqpDTPU2ORetduak2jN0pf+DwvLRwn/Q6Pf3e1ZvcPhRj+54nHHzozX71zswk/PI41d5LZyf PF3h8lZqCkgnZqOM9rPhtRtGQZpzRkDnHX7fFXb/enftPIg7n76G8OlVGr5eLJxvj0Z/k/Kae70F dxsRxAev7bUVFRgEJrIRHWgCyMce+z0cRT/ZsBEFeJDE31/E3ahF5MMcDI7KdpjQKeMP8iyYOuiT vqE7S9NL6zSZ3JKVmi72ocgY5kMQSjs7h0AHFmknmFY8AF9C3TOjZ64Dt0gTEK9vOlOvpFXXjOyu cj735mFcFqoc4yysvQM8ASJFC/49WOPBr5nlEUI4xL4spGol0/ffZuTCGnjZD1+HqDLlXtOHvIHl l9lJ49k3QwH0huhbI3ldn6jcplBgHuI1DBYs0U53GiQel9K+vqjJ3IebE3wnogSt6EydxjYzLZr1 R/LYBLj3CeJHwOrb3p5ECu3zMC6/UIvU+dfuPW7fTwmJ9u1eFWfpbBQYQXgHL/wQGAZtUG8TpDB1 +Kxn//zDFp5x3JdwC5EnqZRpPB3njAaAQJyY6FHBXqoqU92el9UvxdUuxhgy1UgE7lWmo46z+0wD bm768l9r5cgQitpYXe/md6IRLqm4cNiBoivQSJGGxzVR11SSgCyfRw6oqBkkeTb4Ehn4OkazyFi3 /HhbSA6U/PExIgJ14JdFndotZRWsGw8ac2InzcAP/gmxwAea2xTw3m4J6b8SsudlZmz+u0pxTZfh WLmJNRg4gxgJ65L7PMx/ev8usOtHqDYrJiM9yYS9wKZnRh36xvVHK24= X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine10.antispamcloud.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 07:56:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Year 2038 problem and year 2106 chain halting X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 22:59:24 -0000 Good Afternoon, I am certain that as soon as we identify solutions they should be implemented. Basic life skills assert that procrastination is always a form of failure, where we could have realised and accomplished further yet we waited and in our present state could not ascertain what was in our benefit. KING JAMES HRMH Great British Empire Regards, The Australian LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH) of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire MR. Damian A. James Williamson Wills et al. Willtech www.willtech.com.au www.go-overt.com duigco.org DUIGCO API and other projects m. 0487135719 f. +61261470192 This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this email if misdelivered. On 2021-10-15 08:27, James Lu via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Making Bitcoin function after 2038 is by definition a hard fork > > I feel if we do HF, we should bundle other HF changes with it... > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 5:19 PM vjudeu via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > >> It seems that Bitcoin Core will stop working in 2038 because of >> assertion checking if the current time is non-negative. Also, the >> whole chain will halt after reaching median time 0xffffffff in 2106. >> More information: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5365359.0 >> >> I wonder if that kind of issues are possible to fix in a soft-fork >> way. _______________________________________________ >> bitcoin-dev mailing list >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev