To: Andrew LeCody <andrewlecody@gmail.com>,
	bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CADWuND3EfO6YO3g4H09_mWhrHC4PX4SZpTTuETiX2PyCxSRCsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D1167B.1060107@gmail.com>
	<CAEX2NSfaPv0g07hfT31voGWX05Z6uaBsZOjhMkOwBr4mdHbPQw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cameron Garnham <da2ce7@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55D124D7.4050209@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:03:35 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEX2NSfaPv0g07hfT31voGWX05Z6uaBsZOjhMkOwBr4mdHbPQw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="MJLRNg1aAk9TbNmcCEB7Ttbhe9124jNlO"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A
Precedence: list

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--MJLRNg1aAk9TbNmcCEB7Ttbhe9124jNlO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Since it was a game theory analysis. I will not address your other commen=
ts.


On 17/8/2015 7:22 AM, Andrew LeCody wrote:
>> 4. Setup a fork of Bitcoin XT that allows people to easily make a
> transaction only on the XT fork (while leaving the original BTC coins
> untouched).
>=20
> I doubt this is even possible.

Trivial.

There are a few ways: here is my favorite (for the moment).

1. Spam the 8mb blocks with 1 Satoshi outputs to the brainwallet 'Bitcoin=
XT'

2. Let these spam tx be in BitcoinXT, however not Bitcoin (easily done).

3. Let the forked XT client includes a unspent dust output with any
transaction. Let the this client create 100 dust outputs for other
people to use in the same transaction.

This transaction will only be possible to confirm with Bitcoin XT. -
Leaving your Bitcoin coins untouched.

I particularly like this approach, as it is ironic as the spam is more
cheaply done with larger blocks.

Cam.


A quick political note:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstentionism

Hard forks are not something that is a democratic process. Thus
frustrating a false-democratic process is completely legitimate.


--MJLRNg1aAk9TbNmcCEB7Ttbhe9124jNlO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlXRJNwACgkQBJ8cMDO159bJBAD9FtQhX3QaMHdWt0YnbV3+zKwI
3CZcw3ysajhY3Bsyb8oA/itLkUt9kH06FTuQ4uTN2qQEeX/mFGEeN+saA7L92FLZ
=8en1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MJLRNg1aAk9TbNmcCEB7Ttbhe9124jNlO--