Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B839DE7 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:04:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAC4109 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9788038A2C8F for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:04:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:160308:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::JFlhBTvyUV7eejdZ:ojPi From: Luke Dashjr To: Bitcoin Dev Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:04:27 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.18-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201603081904.28687.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:10:34 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 2 promotion to Final X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:04:32 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 19:04:32 -0000 It has been about 1 month since BIP 2 finished receiving comments, so I believe it is an appropriate time to begin the process of moving it to Final Status. Toward this end, I have opened a pull request: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/350 The current requirement for this is that "the reference implementation is complete and accepted by the community". Given the vagueness of this criteria, I intend to move forward applying BIP 2's more specific criteria to itself: > A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves rough > consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have rough > consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development mailing list > for at least one month, and no person maintains any unaddressed > substantiated objections to it. Addressed or obstructive objections may be > ignored/overruled by general agreement that they have been sufficiently > addressed, but clear reasoning must be given in such circumstances. Furthermore, there is a reference implementation in the mentioned PR. Please review the latest draft BIP and provide any objections ASAP. If there are no outstanding objections on 2016 April 9th, I will consider the current draft to have reached rough consensus and update its Status to Final by merging the PR. Thanks, Luke