Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R6sBB-000206-Gp for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:55:41 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.175; envelope-from=thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com; helo=mail-vx0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1R6sBA-0001I0-Pz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:55:41 +0000 Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so1321234vcb.34 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.108.203 with SMTP id g11mr696194vcp.279.1316732135250; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:55:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.202.3 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:55:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?TWFydGlueCAtIBskQiU4JSchPCVgJTobKEI=?= Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:55:05 -0300 Message-ID: To: John Smith Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c09662f9c5504ad8f977d X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (thiagocmartinsc[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1R6sBA-0001I0-Pz Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.4 Release Candidate 2 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:55:41 -0000 --f46d043c09662f9c5504ad8f977d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi John! Thank you for your answer... I have "two kinds" of address, the "static address", which I created myself for any personal reason, and the "dinamic address", which is the automatic generated address when I receive some Bitcoin amount, I label each one (the automatic created by the software) with something like "DINAMIC-1", "DINAMIC-2" and so on... I use my "dinamic address" in a "random" way, following the moon phase... lol My point is: I like to keep track of all my Bitcoin Address, they are all my... Please, leave this feature alive, as a option, disabled by default. I don't know why people fear about their own address... It is all under "Receiving" tab! There is nothing to fear about it. --- BTW, I think this option should have some explanations at the "Options screen", for example: For increasing your anonymity, enable the "Dinamic Bitcoin Address" option and make sure to always use one new and different address for each transaction. And do not link each address with your person! (X) Dynamic Bitcoin Address (a new Bitcoin Address will be created automatically for you, after each new received Bitcoin amount) --- Thank you so much! Best, Thiago 2011/9/22 John Smith > > > 2011/9/22 Martinx - ジェームズ > >> Hi everybody!! >> >> This is my first message here... I'm ThiagoCMC at bitcointalk... >> >> Well, one of the features that I like most is that, every time I receive >> some Bitcoin amount, a new address appear at my "AddressBook"automatically, >> AND, I like to track it. >> > > Can I ask your rationale for this? > > From what I've noticed, most people's workflow is to create a new receiving > address for each new contact that sends them bitcoins (either for every > transaction, or they reuse the address for this person). To make sure that > the address is labeled, they create it themselves and then give out the > generated address. > > They are utterly spooked by suddenly appearing unlabeled addresses, of > which they are unsure whether they are used, and which can never be removed. > > I'm fine with adding it back as an option but please leave it disabled by > default... > > JS > > --f46d043c09662f9c5504ad8f977d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi John!

=C2=A0Thank you for your answer= ...

=C2=A0I have "two kinds" of address,= the "static address", which I created myself for any personal re= ason, and the "dinamic address", which is the automatic generated= address when I receive some Bitcoin amount, I label each one (the automati= c created by the software) with something like "DINAMIC-1", "= ;DINAMIC-2" and so on...

=C2=A0I use my "dinamic address" in a "r= andom" way, following the moon phase... lol

= =C2=A0My point is: I like to keep track of all my Bitcoin Address, they are= all my...

=C2=A0Please, leave this feature alive, as a option, di= sabled by default.

=C2=A0I don't know why peop= le fear about their own address... It is all under "Receiving" ta= b! There is nothing to fear about it.

=C2=A0---

=C2=A0BTW,=C2=A0I th= ink this option should have some explanations at the "Options screen&q= uot;, for example:

=C2=A0For increasing your = anonymity, enable the "Dinamic Bitcoin Address" option and make s= ure to always use one new and different address for each transaction. And d= o not link each address with your person!

=C2=A0(X) Dynamic Bitcoin Address (a new Bitcoin = Address will be created automatically for you, after each new received Bitc= oin amount)

=C2=A0---

=C2= =A0Thank you so much!

Best,
Thiago

2011/9/22 John Smith <witchspace81@gmail.com>


2011/9/22 Martinx - = =E3=82=B8=E3=82=A7=E3=83=BC=E3=83=A0=E3=82=BA <thiagocmartinsc@gma= il.com>
Hi everybody!!

=C2=A0This is my first message= here... I'm ThiagoCMC at bitcointalk...

=C2= =A0Well, one of the features that I like most is that, every time I receive= some Bitcoin amount, a new address appear at my "AddressBook"aut= omatically, AND, I like to track it.

Can I ask your rationale for this?

From = what I've noticed, most people's workflow is to create a new receiv= ing address for each new contact that sends them bitcoins (either for every= transaction, or they reuse the address for this person).=C2=A0 To make sur= e that the address is labeled, they create it themselves and then give out = the generated address.

They are utterly spooked by suddenly appearing unlabeled addresses, of = which they are unsure whether they are used, and which can never be removed= .

I'm fine with adding it back as an option but please leave it = disabled by default...

JS


--f46d043c09662f9c5504ad8f977d--