Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RsDVf-0007VZ-CM for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:12:31 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com; helo=mail-ww0-f53.google.com; Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1RsDVZ-0002hj-Ur for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:12:31 +0000 Received: by wgbdr12 with SMTP id dr12so5877818wgb.10 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:12:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.11.227 with SMTP id el3mr1595354wid.18.1328015539483; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:12:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.112.199 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:12:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120131065444.29110@gmx.net> References: <20120131065444.29110@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:12:19 -0500 Message-ID: From: Gavin Andresen To: thomasV1@gmx.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gavinandresen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RsDVZ-0002hj-Ur Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 (modification BIP 20) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:12:31 -0000 RE: BIP 21 versus BIP 20: I like BIP 21; simpler is better. RE: signing and dating URIs: good ideas. I think we should agree that there is consensus around BIP 21 and then after there is some experience with signing/dating URIs you should write follow-up BIPs . -- -- Gavin Andresen