Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YqsqM-0007NF-CL for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 09 May 2015 00:42:14 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.175; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ig0-f175.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YqsqL-0007Cn-FT for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 09 May 2015 00:42:14 +0000 Received: by iget9 with SMTP id t9so40557967ige.1 for ; Fri, 08 May 2015 17:42:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.126.10 with SMTP id c10mr792729ics.66.1431132128195; Fri, 08 May 2015 17:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.15.82 with HTTP; Fri, 8 May 2015 17:42:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 00:42:08 +0000 Message-ID: From: Gregory Maxwell To: Damian Gomez Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gmaxwell[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1YqsqL-0007Cn-FT Cc: Bitcoin Development Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 48, Issue 41 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 00:42:14 -0000 On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Damian Gomez wrote: > > ...of the following: > > the DH_GENERATION would in effect calculate the reponses for a total > overage of the public component, by addding a ternary option in the actual > DH key (which I have attached to sse if you can iunderstand my logic) [snip code] Intriguing; and certainly a change of the normal pace around here. > where w represents the weight of the total number of semantical > constraints that an idivdual has expressed throught emotivoe packets that I > am working on (implementation os difficutlt). I think this is the > appropriate route to implemeting a greating block size that will be used in > preventing interception of bundled informations and replace value. Client > side implmentation will cut down transaction fees for the additional 264 bit > implementation and greatly reduce need for ewallet providers to do so. In these posts I am reminded of and sense some qualitative similarities with a 2012 proposal by Mr. NASDAQEnema of Bitcointalk with respect to multigenerational token architectures. In particula,r your AES ModuleK Hashcodes (especially in light of Winternitz compression) may constitute an L_2 norm attractor similar to the motherbase birthpoint metric presented in that prior work. Rethaw and I provided a number of points for consideration which may be equally applicable to your work: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=57253.msg682056#msg682056 Your invocation of emotive packets suggests that you may be a colleague of Mr. Virtuli Beatnik? While not (yet) recognized as a star developer himself; his eloquent language and his mastery of skb crypto-calculus and differential-kernel number-ontologies demonstrated in his latest publication ( https://archive.org/details/EtherealVerses ) makes me think that he'd be an ideal collaborator for your work in this area.