Message-ID: <55DCDB98.80004@bitcartel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:18:16 -0700
From: Simon Liu <simon@bitcartel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>, 
 Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
References: <CAED3CWipF8u5g3LUrqfyHxvEk4Lu+d12ZOJZnoBUw6iZZOg-ZQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFzgq-x9GBbqARyhMgfSPc=wYeBgzXy4VUQ0D76GC+TCAxWDuA@mail.gmail.com>	<20150825201643.GC11083@muck>
	<1489961.GhSFCGzPRJ@crushinator> <20150825203744.GB3464@muck>
In-Reply-To: <20150825203744.GB3464@muck>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, greg@xiph.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
 [BIP 1xx - Draft]
Precedence: list

I don't think this would work.

If the rule is that one user can only have one vote, how do you prevent
a user running multiple nodes?

Also, how do you verify that a node is indeed a fully validating node
with its own copy of the blockchain?


On 08/25/2015 01:37 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 
> An interesting idea would be to design a voting mechanism such that only
> users with access to validating nodes be able to vote - a fundemental
> requirement for users to fully participate in Bitcoin's goverance.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>