Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064AB273 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:50:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from bitcoin.co.th (support.bitcoin.co.th [162.213.249.178]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F00AC for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [103.233.177.148] (port=49751 helo=[192.168.0.116]) by server1.advancedstyle.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZG1M3-0005HV-SD; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 04:50:53 -0400 Message-ID: <55A8C1EF.8050603@bitcoin.co.th> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:50:55 +0700 From: "David Barnes | Bitcoin Co. Ltd." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Micha Bailey References: <55A867B9.202@bitcoin.co.th> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.advancedstyle.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.linuxfoundation.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bitcoin.co.th X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server1.advancedstyle.com: authenticated_id: david.barnes@bitcoin.co.th X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP0074 Draft (Dynamic Rate Lookup) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:50:58 -0000 I picked up the next available number myself, but can be changed to anything, the 74 is unimportant to the proposal. David Barnes On 7/17/2015 2:54 PM, Micha Bailey wrote: > Did Greg assign this number? He didn't do it here on the ML. You're > not supposed to use arbitrary numbers, certainly not numbers that are > close/similar to ones already assigned. >